Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2000, published 89th ILC session (2001)

In its earlier comments, the Committee had drawn attention to Ordinance No. 21 of 1955 on compensation for occupational injuries, which does not give full effect to certain provisions of the Convention. Thus, on the one hand, section 2(1)(a) of the Ordinance excludes from its scope manual workers whose earnings exceed a certain limit, contrary to Article 2(2)(d) of the Convention which only authorizes this type of exclusion for non-manual workers and, on the other hand, section 8(a), (b) and (c) of the same Ordinance provides that, in the event of death or permanent incapacity, compensation shall be paid to the victim in the form of a lump sum, while Article 5 of the Convention guarantees compensation for the victim or his dependants in the form of periodical payments. Such compensation may however be wholly or partially paid in a lump sum if the competent authority is satisfied that it will be properly utilized.

In its report, the Government indicates that the draft legislation placing compensation for occupational injuries under the social security scheme has still not been implemented. However, sickness and survivors’ benefits are granted to victims of occupational accidents or their dependants under social security legislation without taking the occupational origin of the incident into account.

While noting this information, the Committee recalls that in its 1991 observation it drew the Government’s attention to the fact that the right to sickness, disablement and survivors’ benefits granted under the social security legislation (Social Security (Benefits) Regulations, 1981) is conditional upon a minimum qualifying period, which is contrary to the Convention. Given these circumstances, the Committee hopes the Government will take all the measures necessary to ensure full application of Articles 2 and 5 of the Convention, either by establishing an employment industry benefit scheme under the social security scheme in conformity with the Convention, or by amending section 2(1)(a) and section 8(a), (b) and (c) of Ordinance No. 21 of 1955 on compensation for occupational accidents in the light of the above comments. The Committee trusts that the Government’s next report will indicate progress achieved in this connection.