ILO-en-strap
NORMLEX
Information System on International Labour Standards
NORMLEX Home > Country profiles >  > Comments > All Comments

Display in: French - Spanish

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2020, published 109th ILC session (2021)

In order to provide a comprehensive view of the issues relating to the application of the ratified Conventions on social security, the Committee considers it appropriate to examine Conventions Nos 12 (workers’ compensation, agriculture), 18 (workers’ compensation, occupational diseases), and 19 (equality of treatment, accident compensation) together.
Article 1 of Convention No. 12. Scope of coverage. With regard to its previous comments concerning the need to ensure effective equality of treatment of agricultural wage earners with other workers in respect of occupational accidents, the Committee takes due note of the information provided by the Government that agricultural workers are covered for work accidents and occupational diseases, under Decree No. 6/80 of 1980, which approves the Regulations of Decree No. 4/80 of 1980 on mandatory insurance for work accidents and occupational diseases, in the same manner as other workers. The Committee requests the Government to provide a general appreciation of the manner in which Convention No. 12 is effectively applied, including extracts from the reports of the inspection services, and information on the number of workers covered and injuries reported in the agriculture sector.
Article 1 of Convention No. 18. Scope of coverage. (i) Workers in the informal economy. In its previous comments, the Committee hoped that the Government would progress in the implementation of the non-contributory social security scheme in accordance with Act No. 4/2007 through the adoption of new regulations, to enable workers in the informal economy to benefit from compensation in cases of occupational accident or disease. The Committee notes the indication by the Government in its report that this scheme, referred to as the “citizen benefit” is facing serious problems as regards funding and sustainability due to weak administrative capacities. The Government also provides information on the implementation of the voluntary scheme through the entry into force of the Regulations on voluntary contributions to the social security system, pursuant to Decree No. 6 of 2012, which gives the possibility to workers in the informal economy to affiliate themselves with the social security system. The Committee notes with interest that, according to the Government, the implementation of these provisions has resulted in the extension of the protection provided in case of employment injury to an additional number of workers including, notably, women working in the informal economy. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the modalities governing the voluntary affiliation of workers and the financing of benefits pursuant to Decree No. 6 of 2012 and on the measures taken for its effective implementation, together with a copy of the Decree. The Committee further requests the Government to provide statistical information on the number of workers who have registered with the social security system on a voluntary basis. With regard to the protection of workers in the informal economy who are not affiliated with the social security system against occupational diseases, the Committee hopes that the Government will take the necessary measures to implement the “citizen benefit” pursuant to Chapter V of Act No. 4 of 2007 and requests the Government to keep it informed of progress made in this regard.
(ii) Coverage of public servants. As regards its previous comments in which it requested the Government to take the necessary measures to ensure that public servants were covered by the social protection system, and thereby protected in case of work accident and occupational disease, the Committee notes the indication provided by the Government that, despite the weakness of the system, some progress has been achieved. The Government refers, in this regard, to improvements in the strategic planning and governance of social protection institutions, which have led to the creation of a body responsible for the administration of the pension fund of public servants. The Committee hopes that progress will also be made in the area of employment injury protection and requests the Government to take the necessary measures to ensure that public servants are compensated in case of occupational diseases, in application of Article 1 of Convention No. 18.
Article 2 of Convention No. 18. List of occupational diseases. With reference to its previous comments concerning the completion of the process for adopting a list of occupational diseases including at least the diseases recognized under Convention No. 18, the Committee notes the Government’s indication that there has been some progress with implementation. According to the Government, a bill on occupational safety and health has been drawn up by the Directorate of Labour, Employment and Vocational Training and will be submitted to the Council of Ministers in due course. In addition, the Government indicates that the National Insurance and Social Security Institute has been requested to proceed with the revision of Decree No. 4/80 of 9 February 1980 for the inclusion of a list of occupational diseases. The Committee requests the Government to ensure that a national list of occupational diseases is adopted without delay, including at least the diseases and poisonings produced by the substances set forth in the Schedule appended to Article 2 of Convention No. 18.
Application of Conventions Nos. 12 and 18 in practice. It its previous comments, the Committee noted that the priorities of the Decent Work Programme 2012–15 of Guinea-Bissau included among other the strengthening and expansion of the social protection system, particularly for women and workers in the informal economy, and hoped that the measures envisaged by the Government would provide the means to overcome the difficulties it was facing. In reply, the Government indicates that structural issues are still present, which hampers the ability of the State to give full effect to the Convention. The Committee takes note, in particular, of the financial and economic difficulties indicated by the Government, which prevent the proper functioning of the social security system in its entirety. The Committee also takes note of the indication by the Government of a lack of capacity in statistical data collection. The Committee hopes that the Government will be in a position to indicate progress in the application of the Conventions by tackling the above-mentioned issues and reminds the Government of the possibility to avail itself of ILO technical assistance in this regard.
Article 1 of Convention No. 19. System of automatic reciprocity laid down by the Convention. The Committee notes the reply provided by the Government in response to its previous comments requesting the implementation by the Government of the system of automatic reciprocity laid down by the Convention for foreign workers of all countries party to the Convention. The Committee notes, in particular, the Government’s indication that it welcomes the Committee’s suggestion to modify section 3 of Decree No. 4/80 of 1980 and section 5 of Legislative Decree No. 5/86 of 1986 for this purpose, while observing that no concrete measures have yet been taken to this effect. The Committee thus requests once again the Government to take the necessary measures to give full effect to Convention No. 19 by ensuring the equality of treatment for foreign workers of all countries party to the Convention in respect of workers’ compensation. In this view, the Committee reiterates its suggestion to the Government to consider replacing the phrase “subject to reciprocity” contained in section 3 of Decree No. 4/80 and section 5 of Legislative Decree No. 5/86 by the phrase “subject to the existence of a reciprocity agreement,” on the understanding that Convention No. 19 would be considered such an agreement.
The Committee has been informed that, based on the recommendations of the Standards Review Mechanism Tripartite Working Group (SRM Tripartite Working Group), the Governing Body has decided that member States for which Convention No. 18 is in force should be encouraged to ratify the more recent Employment Injury Benefits Convention, 1964 [Schedule I amended in 1980] (No. 121) or to ratify the Social Security (Minimum Standards) Convention, 1952 (No. 102) and accept the obligations in its Part VI (see GB.328/LILS/2/1). Conventions Nos 121 and 102 (Part VI) reflect the more modern approach to employment injury benefits.  The Committee therefore encourages the Government to follow up the Governing Body’s decision at its 328th Session (October–November 2016) approving the recommendations of the SRM Tripartite Working Group and to consider ratifying Convention No. 102 or Convention No. 121 as the most up-to-date instruments in this subject area.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2018, published 108th ILC session (2019)

The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that the next report will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous comments initially made in 2013.
Repetition
The Committee notes the Government’s overall report describing how the social security system gives effect to Conventions Nos 12, 17, 18 and 19 relating to occupational accidents and diseases. The Committee notes that the priorities of the Decent Work Programme 2012–15 of Guinea-Bissau include the strengthening and expansion of the social protection system, particularly for women and workers in the informal economy. The expected results include an increase in the number of persons receiving social benefits, since priority has been afforded to improving governance through assistance for the strategic planning of institutions responsible for social protection, improving the application and monitoring of social security standards as well as training social protection stakeholders. The Committee hopes that these measures for strengthening the social security system will, in particular, provide the means to overcome the difficulties faced by the Government regarding the collection of statistics and the implementation of legislation in practice, especially by enhancing the resources of the labour inspectorate for enforcing the current legislation. The Committee also hopes that the Government will be in a position in its next report to indicate progress achieved in the following areas which have been discussed by the Committee and the Government for a number of years:
  • – implementation of the non-contributory social security scheme in accordance with Act No. 4/2007 through the adoption of the new regulations mentioned in the Government’s report to enable workers in the informal economy to benefit from protection in cases of occupational accident or disease;
  • – adoption of the necessary measures, including budgetary measures, to ensure that public servants are covered by the social protection system;
  • – ensuring effective equality of treatment of agricultural wage earners with other workers in respect of occupational accidents by reforming existing legislation;
  • – ensuring protection of domestic workers against occupational accidents in accordance with the draft new Labour Code;
  • – completion of the process for adopting a list of occupational diseases including at least the diseases recognized under the Workmen’s Compensation (Occupational Diseases) Convention, 1925 (No. 18);
  • – ensuring that when compensation for an occupational accident is granted in the form of a lump sum, an authority guarantees the proper utilization of the funds in accordance with the Workmen’s Compensation (Accidents) Convention, 1925 (No. 17);
  • – implementing the system of automatic reciprocity laid down by the Equality of Treatment (Accident Compensation) Convention, 1925 (No. 19), for foreign workers of all countries party to the Convention.
In this respect, recalling that the Constitution and national legislation continue to lay down reciprocity as a requirement for equality of treatment between foreign workers employed in Guinea-Bissau and Guinean nationals (article 28 of the Constitution, section 3(1) of Decree No. 4/80 and section 5(1) of Legislative Decree No. 5/86), the Committee points out that this Convention represents a multilateral social security agreement such as those promoted by section 3(1) of Act No. 4/2007 to ensure national reciprocal treatment. This being the case, the Government might consider replacing the phrase “subject to reciprocity” contained in section 3 of Decree No. 4/80 and section 5 of Legislative Decree No. 5/86 by the phrase “subject to the existence of a reciprocity agreement,” on the understanding that Convention No. 19 would be considered such an agreement.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2013, published 103rd ILC session (2014)

The Committee notes the Government’s overall report describing how the social security system gives effect to Conventions Nos 12, 17, 18 and 19 relating to occupational accidents and diseases. The Committee notes that the priorities of the Decent Work Programme 2012–15 of Guinea-Bissau include the strengthening and expansion of the social protection system, particularly for women and workers in the informal economy. The expected results include an increase in the number of persons receiving social benefits, since priority has been afforded to improving governance through assistance for the strategic planning of institutions responsible for social protection, improving the application and monitoring of social security standards as well as training social protection stakeholders. The Committee hopes that these measures for strengthening the social security system will, in particular, provide the means to overcome the difficulties faced by the Government regarding the collection of statistics and the implementation of legislation in practice, especially by enhancing the resources of the labour inspectorate for enforcing the current legislation. The Committee also hopes that the Government will be in a position in its next report to indicate progress achieved in the following areas which have been discussed by the Committee and the Government for a number of years:
  • -implementation of the non-contributory social security scheme in accordance with Act No. 4/2007 through the adoption of the new regulations mentioned in the Government’s report to enable workers in the informal economy to benefit from protection in cases of occupational accident or disease;
  • -adoption of the necessary measures, including budgetary measures, to ensure that public servants are covered by the social protection system;
  • -ensuring effective equality of treatment of agricultural wage earners with other workers in respect of occupational accidents by reforming existing legislation;
  • -ensuring protection of domestic workers against occupational accidents in accordance with the draft new Labour Code;
  • -completion of the process for adopting a list of occupational diseases including at least the diseases recognized under the Workmen’s Compensation (Occupational Diseases) Convention, 1925 (No. 18);
  • -ensuring that when compensation for an occupational accident is granted in the form of a lump sum, an authority guarantees the proper utilization of the funds in accordance with the Workmen’s Compensation (Accidents) Convention, 1925 (No. 17);
  • -implementing the system of automatic reciprocity laid down by the Equality of Treatment (Accident Compensation) Convention, 1925 (No. 19), for foreign workers of all countries party to the Convention.
In this respect, recalling that the Constitution and national legislation continue to lay down reciprocity as a requirement for equality of treatment between foreign workers employed in Guinea-Bissau and Guinean nationals (article 28 of the Constitution, section 3(1) of Decree No. 4/80 and section 5(1) of Legislative Decree No. 5/86), the Committee points out that this Convention represents a multilateral social security agreement such as those promoted by section 3(1) of Act No. 4/2007 to ensure national reciprocal treatment. This being the case, the Government might consider replacing the phrase “subject to reciprocity” contained in section 3 of Decree No. 4/80 and section 5 of Legislative Decree No. 5/86 by the phrase “subject to the existence of a reciprocity agreement,” on the understanding that Convention No. 19 would be considered such an agreement.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2012, published 102nd ILC session (2013)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It must therefore repeat its previous observation which read as follows:
Repetition
Reporting obligations. The Committee notes the Government’s reports on Conventions Nos 12, 17, 18 and 19, received for the first time since the year 2000, notwithstanding the numerous reminders sent to the Government. It regrets, however, that they still do not reply to most of the questions raised in the comments of 2001 and repeated in 2008, 2009 and 2010. The National Union of Workers of Guinea-Bissau (UNTG) in its observations on the Government’s reports on ratified Conventions, stressed that the Government should step up its efforts to comply with international labor standards and bring its legislation in line with the ILO Conventions. In the UNTG’s opinion, the Government should take all necessary measures to strengthen its technical, material and financial capabilities to enforce the application of the legal standards in the private and public labor sectors. The Committee hopes that the Government will take these observations into account and will not fail to include the information requested in its next detailed reports on these Conventions due before 1 September 2012. The Government is also reminded to provide detailed information on the practical application of these Conventions as required in Part V of the report forms, particularly on the number and nature of the occupational accidents reported and the amount of benefits paid.
Legal framework of protection against occupational accidents and diseases in Guinea-Bissau. The said legal framework is composed of several laws and decrees, including Decree No. 4/80 on Compulsory Insurance on Occupational Accidents and Diseases (6 February 1980), Regulatory Decree No. 6/80 (6 February 1980) regulating Decree No. 4/80, Legislative Decree No. 5/86 on Establishment of a Social Protection Regime (29 March 1986), Legislative Decree No. 1/97 on Replacement of the National Institute of Insurance and Social Protection (INPS) and GUIBIS-Guinea-Bissau Insurances SÀRL (29 April 1997), and Act No. 4/2007 on Legal Framework for Social Protection (3 September 2007). Decree No. 4/80 governs compulsory insurance against occupational accidents and diseases providing for the workers’ (and their family members’) right to compensation. It sets the definition of occupational accidents and diseases and rules regarding the exercise of the rights to compensation under the compulsory insurance scheme, and financed through employers’ and workers’ contributions, operated by the INPS. Regulatory Decree No. 6/80 establishes different types of benefits to which a worker suffering an occupational accident or disease is entitled according to the degree of incapacity, and sets forth the rules to determine the base salary upon which compensation is paid. Legislative Decree No. 5/86 repeals the provisions of the Agricultural Code and establishes the basis of the general regime of social security. Legislative Decree No. 1/97 replaces the former Institute with the INPS. Lastly, Act No. 4/2007 establishes a Legal Framework for Social Protection for the population of the country, consisting of three schemes: Citizenship Social Protection of a non-contributory nature; Mandatory Social Protection, which is a contributory regime covering all wage earners (nationals or foreigners); and a voluntary Complementary Social Security scheme. The Committee would ask the Government to complete the above description of the legal framework existing in the country and providing protection against occupational accidents and diseases, clarifying in particular: (i) whether Act No. 4/2007 has entered into force and been regulated; (ii) whether Decree No. 4/80 and Regulatory Decree No. 6/80 have been repealed by Act No. 4/2007; (iii) the relations between Regulatory Decree No. 5/86 and Act No. 4/2007, with respect to their scope of application, rules regarding foreign workers, benefits and degrees of compensation for incapacity of workers due to occupational accidents and diseases; (iv) proposals for reforming this framework and elaborating new legislation.
Adoption of the list of occupational diseases. The Committee recalls that back in 2000, the Government stated that the INPS, which has competence for workers’ compensation for occupational accidents and diseases, was having difficulty in identifying occupational diseases, and consequently, the Ministry of Public Health had not been able to adopt a list of such diseases. In its 2011 report on Convention No. 18, the Government regretted that Guinea-Bissau has neither enacted a legal regime regulating occupational diseases nor adopted a list of such diseases but reported that a Commission has been established to review the legislation regarding industrial accidents and to draft legislation and establish a list of occupational diseases. While taking due note of these developments, the Committee wishes to remind the Government that by ratifying Convention No. 18 it has made the list of diseases in Schedule to Article 2 of the Convention part of the national legal order of Guinea-Bissau. That list was elaborated by the International Labour Conference back in 1925 specifically for the purpose of providing countries, which had no capacity to establish their own lists, with a ready-made compendium of diseases recognized as occupational on the basis of the best international experience available at that time. Since then, the ILO list of occupational diseases has been complemented on several occasions (see Conventions Nos 42 and 121 and Recommendation No. 194) by new diseases the professional origin of which was ascertained by the evolution of scientific knowledge. The diseases listed in Convention No. 18 ratified by Guinea-Bissau therefore constitute the minimum protection to be ensured and must be automatically recognized as occupational where contracted in the conditions prescribed in the Schedule by all the national authorities for the purposes of workmen’s compensation. The Committee would like the Government to explain what legal or other reasons prevented it for so long from bringing this list to the attention of the national labor administration, social insurance and judicial authorities in order to ensure the practical implementation of the obligations assumed by the country under Convention No. 18. The Committee again expresses the hope that the Government will take all necessary steps to ensure, through the adoption of the new legislation referred to in its report, that the list of occupational diseases established by the Convention becomes fully operational and legally enforceable in the country for the purpose of workmen’s compensation.
Compensation for occupational accidents and diseases. The Committee notes from the report on Convention No. 17 that, in practice, compensation may be paid wholly as a lump sum. Please indicate what authority is competent to decide that payment shall be made in a lump sum and what guarantees, if any, for the proper utilization of the lump sum it ordinarily requires, in accordance with Article 5 of Convention No. 17. The report also states that public servants are not subject to any legal framework in relation to compensation in case of industrial accidents, but, if a public servant suffers a personal injury due to an industrial accident, he/she receives compensation in the form of a sum of money. The Committee would ask the Government whether any consideration was given to the possibility to include public servants within the legal framework protection against occupational accidents and diseases. Finally the Committee notes that, according to section 17(2) of Decree No. 6/80, where the incapacity is such that the injured person must have the help of another person or special care, the pension may be increased to up to 100 per cent of the basic wage. Please indicate the number of people who are actually receiving such an increased pension.
Application to agricultural wage earners. In its previous reports on Convention No. 12, the Government had indicated that Decrees Nos 4/80 and 6/80 governing compulsory insurance against occupational accidents and diseases applied to agricultural wage-earners. In its 2011 report, the Government indicates that, according to section 1(b) of Chapter I of Legislative Decree No. 5/86 only agricultural wage-earners whose employers can be identified are mandatorily covered, while independent agricultural wage-earners who do not perform their work in a family regime, as set out in section 2(2)(d) of Decree No. 4/80 are excluded from coverage. Section 17 of Act No. 4/2007 provides, however, that wage-earners in all branches and sectors are to be included in the Mandatory Social Protection System, provided that the employer they work for can be identified, with the exclusion only of domestic workers who are subject to a special regime. The Committee would like the Government to explain what agricultural wage-earners are covered by the family regime and whether they benefit from the protection given by the legislation cited above. Please explain also the special regime applicable to the domestic workers.
Section 6 et seq. of Decree No. 4/80 set forth a general definition of occupational accidents as well as the definitions related to specific sectors such as agriculture, where according to the Government, occupational accidents are defined as the wrong use of chemical products and protection equipment. The Committee wishes to point out that the principle of equality of treatment of agricultural wage-earners implies that they should benefit from the same definition of occupational accidents that is applicable to other workers. The Government should therefore consider harmonizing the different definitions of occupational accidents so that workers in different sectors of activities would benefit from the same protection and compensation.
The Government states that it has no statistics on occupational accidents and diseases because most of agricultural wage-earners are not aware of their obligation under Article 20 of Decree No. 4/80 to report the occurrence of any occupational accident or disease to the National Institute of Social Security. The General Labour Inspection has neither special knowledge in the field of agricultural work nor financial nor human resources to carry out inspections in the agricultural sector. Most occupational accidents and diseases are caused by the fact that agricultural workers do not wear suitable protection equipment in carrying out their tasks. Some companies fail to comply with their obligations under occupational accidents and diseases legislation and some other are not even registered with the INPS. The Committee notes the practical difficulties encountered by the Government in the application of Convention No. 12. It observes that these difficulties will not go away without systemic and vigorous action taken by the Government in cooperation with the social partners to raise awareness of workers and companies of their respective rights and obligations, establish simple and rapid procedures for reporting occupational accidents supported by insurance compensation and labor inspection, promote the use of protection equipment and safer technologies, etc. The Committee asks the Government to step up its efforts to reduce the gap between the agricultural and the industrial sectors with regard to protection against the occupational accidents and diseases and to indicate the concrete measures taken in this direction in its next report.
Equality of treatment of foreign workers. In its previous comments concerning Convention No. 19, the Committee pointed out that section 3(1) of Decree No. 4/80 is inconsistent with the Convention in that it lays down reciprocity as a requirement for equality of treatment between foreign workers employed in Guinea-Bissau and national workers. In response, the Government mentions that article 28 of the Constitution forbids any discrimination between foreigners and citizens and that under the current legal order, equality of treatment regarding accident compensation is granted to all workers. In practice, the Government indicates that the General Labour and Social Security Inspectorate did not find any situation amounting to unequal treatment of injured workers, and that no judicial decisions have been rendered evidencing unequal treatment between foreign and national workers.
The Committee also notes that section 17(2) of Act No. 4/2007 provides that workers who suffered injuries as a result of an industrial accident are covered by the mandatory social protection scheme without any condition as to residence in the country, and section 3 requires the Government to foster the conclusion or adherence to international agreements aiming at the reciprocal recognition of equality of treatment of the nationals of the countries concerned. The Committee recalls, in this respect, that Convention No. 19 lays down a system of automatic reciprocity between the 121 ILO member States which have ratified it, and thereby ensures that nationals of all countries party to the Convention, as well as their dependants, benefit from national treatment in respect of workmen’s compensation. The Government is therefore requested to amend section 3(1) of Decree No. 4/80 so as to delete the reciprocity requirement and bring the latter into conformity with the Convention and Act No. 4/2007. The Committee also requests that the Government indicate, pursuant to Article 1(2) of the Convention, whether any compensation is paid for injured persons or their dependants residing outside the country, and if so, to provide the statistical data confirming these payments.
The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the near future.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2011, published 101st ILC session (2012)

Reporting obligations. The Committee notes the Government’s reports on Conventions Nos 12, 17, 18 and 19, received for the first time since the year 2000, notwithstanding the numerous reminders sent to the Government. It regrets, however, that they still do not reply to most of the questions raised in the comments of 2001 and repeated in 2008, 2009 and 2010. The National Union of Workers of Guinea-Bissau (UNTG) in its observations on the Government’s reports on ratified Conventions, stressed that the Government should step up its efforts to comply with international labor standards and bring its legislation in line with the ILO Conventions. In the UNTG’s opinion, the Government should take all necessary measures to strengthen its technical, material and financial capabilities to enforce the application of the legal standards in the private and public labor sectors. The Committee hopes that the Government will take these observations into account and will not fail to include the information requested in its next detailed reports on these Conventions due before 1 September 2012. The Government is also reminded to provide detailed information on the practical application of these Conventions as required in Part V of the report forms, particularly on the number and nature of the occupational accidents reported and the amount of benefits paid.
Legal framework of protection against occupational accidents and diseases in Guinea-Bissau. The said legal framework is composed of several laws and decrees, including Decree No. 4/80 on Compulsory Insurance on Occupational Accidents and Diseases (6 February 1980), Regulatory Decree No. 6/80 (6 February 1980) regulating Decree No. 4/80, Legislative Decree No. 5/86 on Establishment of a Social Protection Regime (29 March 1986), Legislative Decree No. 1/97 on Replacement of the National Institute of Insurance and Social Protection (INPS) and GUIBIS-Guinea-Bissau Insurances SÀRL (29 April 1997), and Act No. 4/2007 on Legal Framework for Social Protection (3 September 2007). Decree No. 4/80 governs compulsory insurance against occupational accidents and diseases providing for the workers’ (and their family members’) right to compensation. It sets the definition of occupational accidents and diseases and rules regarding the exercise of the rights to compensation under the compulsory insurance scheme, and financed through employers’ and workers’ contributions, operated by the INPS. Regulatory Decree No. 6/80 establishes different types of benefits to which a worker suffering an occupational accident or disease is entitled according to the degree of incapacity, and sets forth the rules to determine the base salary upon which compensation is paid. Legislative Decree No. 5/86 repeals the provisions of the Agricultural Code and establishes the basis of the general regime of social security. Legislative Decree No. 1/97 replaces the former Institute with the INPS. Lastly, Act No. 4/2007 establishes a Legal Framework for Social Protection for the population of the country, consisting of three schemes: Citizenship Social Protection of a non-contributory nature; Mandatory Social Protection, which is a contributory regime covering all wage earners (nationals or foreigners); and a voluntary Complementary Social Security scheme. The Committee would ask the Government to complete the above description of the legal framework existing in the country and providing protection against occupational accidents and diseases, clarifying in particular: (i) whether Act No. 4/2007 has entered into force and been regulated; (ii) whether Decree No. 4/80 and Regulatory Decree No. 6/80 have been repealed by Act No. 4/2007; (iii) the relations between Regulatory Decree No. 5/86 and Act No. 4/2007, with respect to their scope of application, rules regarding foreign workers, benefits and degrees of compensation for incapacity of workers due to occupational accidents and diseases; (iv) proposals for reforming this framework and elaborating new legislation.
Adoption of the list of occupational diseases. The Committee recalls that back in 2000, the Government stated that the INPS, which has competence for workers’ compensation for occupational accidents and diseases, was having difficulty in identifying occupational diseases, and consequently, the Ministry of Public Health had not been able to adopt a list of such diseases. In its 2011 report on Convention No. 18, the Government regretted that Guinea-Bissau has neither enacted a legal regime regulating occupational diseases nor adopted a list of such diseases but reported that a Commission has been established to review the legislation regarding industrial accidents and to draft legislation and establish a list of occupational diseases. While taking due note of these developments, the Committee wishes to remind the Government that by ratifying Convention No. 18 it has made the list of diseases in Schedule to Article 2 of the Convention part of the national legal order of Guinea-Bissau. That list was elaborated by the International Labour Conference back in 1925 specifically for the purpose of providing countries, which had no capacity to establish their own lists, with a ready-made compendium of diseases recognized as occupational on the basis of the best international experience available at that time. Since then, the ILO list of occupational diseases has been complemented on several occasions (see Conventions Nos 42 and 121 and Recommendation No. 194) by new diseases the professional origin of which was ascertained by the evolution of scientific knowledge. The diseases listed in Convention No. 18 ratified by Guinea-Bissau therefore constitute the minimum protection to be ensured and must be automatically recognized as occupational where contracted in the conditions prescribed in the Schedule by all the national authorities for the purposes of workmen’s compensation. The Committee would like the Government to explain what legal or other reasons prevented it for so long from bringing this list to the attention of the national labor administration, social insurance and judicial authorities in order to ensure the practical implementation of the obligations assumed by the country under Convention No. 18. The Committee again expresses the hope that the Government will take all necessary steps to ensure, through the adoption of the new legislation referred to in its report, that the list of occupational diseases established by the Convention becomes fully operational and legally enforceable in the country for the purpose of workmen’s compensation.
Compensation for occupational accidents and diseases. The Committee notes from the report on Convention No. 17 that, in practice, compensation may be paid wholly as a lump sum. Please indicate what authority is competent to decide that payment shall be made in a lump sum and what guarantees, if any, for the proper utilization of the lump sum it ordinarily requires, in accordance with Article 5 of Convention No. 17. The report also states that public servants are not subject to any legal framework in relation to compensation in case of industrial accidents, but, if a public servant suffers a personal injury due to an industrial accident, he/she receives compensation in the form of a sum of money. The Committee would ask the Government whether any consideration was given to the possibility to include public servants within the legal framework protection against occupational accidents and diseases. Finally the Committee notes that, according to section 17(2) of Decree No. 6/80, where the incapacity is such that the injured person must have the help of another person or special care, the pension may be increased to up to 100 per cent of the basic wage. Please indicate the number of people who are actually receiving such an increased pension.
Application to agricultural wage earners. In its previous reports on Convention No. 12, the Government had indicated that Decrees Nos 4/80 and 6/80 governing compulsory insurance against occupational accidents and diseases applied to agricultural wage-earners. In its 2011 report, the Government indicates that, according to section 1(b) of Chapter I of Legislative Decree No. 5/86 only agricultural wage-earners whose employers can be identified are mandatorily covered, while independent agricultural wage-earners who do not perform their work in a family regime, as set out in section 2(2)(d) of Decree No. 4/80 are excluded from coverage. Section 17 of Act No. 4/2007 provides, however, that wage-earners in all branches and sectors are to be included in the Mandatory Social Protection System, provided that the employer they work for can be identified, with the exclusion only of domestic workers who are subject to a special regime. The Committee would like the Government to explain what agricultural wage-earners are covered by the family regime and whether they benefit from the protection given by the legislation cited above. Please explain also the special regime applicable to the domestic workers.
Section 6 et seq. of Decree No. 4/80 set forth a general definition of occupational accidents as well as the definitions related to specific sectors such as agriculture, where according to the Government, occupational accidents are defined as the wrong use of chemical products and protection equipment. The Committee wishes to point out that the principle of equality of treatment of agricultural wage-earners implies that they should benefit from the same definition of occupational accidents that is applicable to other workers. The Government should therefore consider harmonizing the different definitions of occupational accidents so that workers in different sectors of activities would benefit from the same protection and compensation.
The Government states that it has no statistics on occupational accidents and diseases because most of agricultural wage-earners are not aware of their obligation under Article 20 of Decree No. 4/80 to report the occurrence of any occupational accident or disease to the National Institute of Social Security. The General Labour Inspection has neither special knowledge in the field of agricultural work nor financial nor human resources to carry out inspections in the agricultural sector. Most occupational accidents and diseases are caused by the fact that agricultural workers do not wear suitable protection equipment in carrying out their tasks. Some companies fail to comply with their obligations under occupational accidents and diseases legislation and some other are not even registered with the INPS. The Committee notes the practical difficulties encountered by the Government in the application of Convention No. 12. It observes that these difficulties will not go away without systemic and vigorous action taken by the Government in cooperation with the social partners to raise awareness of workers and companies of their respective rights and obligations, establish simple and rapid procedures for reporting occupational accidents supported by insurance compensation and labor inspection, promote the use of protection equipment and safer technologies, etc. The Committee asks the Government to step up its efforts to reduce the gap between the agricultural and the industrial sectors with regard to protection against the occupational accidents and diseases and to indicate the concrete measures taken in this direction in its next report.
Equality of treatment of foreign workers. In its previous comments concerning Convention No. 19, the Committee pointed out that section 3(1) of Decree No. 4/80 is inconsistent with the Convention in that it lays down reciprocity as a requirement for equality of treatment between foreign workers employed in Guinea-Bissau and national workers. In response, the Government mentions that article 28 of the Constitution forbids any discrimination between foreigners and citizens and that under the current legal order, equality of treatment regarding accident compensation is granted to all workers. In practice, the Government indicates that the General Labour and Social Security Inspectorate did not find any situation amounting to unequal treatment of injured workers, and that no judicial decisions have been rendered evidencing unequal treatment between foreign and national workers.
The Committee also notes that section 17(2) of Act No. 4/2007 provides that workers who suffered injuries as a result of an industrial accident are covered by the mandatory social protection scheme without any condition as to residence in the country, and section 3 requires the Government to foster the conclusion or adherence to international agreements aiming at the reciprocal recognition of equality of treatment of the nationals of the countries concerned. The Committee recalls, in this respect, that Convention No. 19 lays down a system of automatic reciprocity between the 121 ILO member States which have ratified it, and thereby ensures that nationals of all countries party to the Convention, as well as their dependants, benefit from national treatment in respect of workmen’s compensation. The Government is therefore requested to amend section 3(1) of Decree No. 4/80 so as to delete the reciprocity requirement and bring the latter into conformity with the Convention and Act No. 4/2007. The Committee also requests that the Government indicate, pursuant to Article 1(2) of the Convention, whether any compensation is paid for injured persons or their dependants residing outside the country, and if so, to provide the statistical data confirming these payments.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2010, published 100th ILC session (2011)

The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report has not been received. It must therefore repeat its previous observation, which read as follows:

Article 1(1) of the Convention. Equality of treatment. In its previous comments, the Committee drew the Government’s attention to section 3(1) of Decree No. 4/80 of 1981, concerning compulsory insurance against industrial accidents and occupational diseases. It pointed out that the abovementioned provision is inconsistent with the Convention in that it lays down reciprocity as a requirement for equal treatment between foreign workers employed in Guinea-Bissau and Guinean workers. In response, the Government states that the matter is still receiving its attention but that, as yet, no text has been adopted regarding the reciprocity required by section 3(1) of the abovementioned Decree. The Committee recalls in this connection that the Convention lays down a system of automatic reciprocity between member States which have ratified it. In these circumstances, it hopes that the Government will very shortly take all necessary steps to bring the abovementioned provision of its legislation into line with Article 1(1), of the Convention by ensuring that all nationals of States which have ratified this Convention are automatically afforded the same treatment as nationals of Guinea-Bissau with regard to accident compensation.

Article 1(2). Transfer of benefits abroad. The Committee asks the Government to provide information on any compensation paid for injured persons or their dependants residing outside the country.

Article 2. Temporary or intermittent work. In its previous comments the Committee noted that section 3(3) of Decree No. 4/80 which excludes from the scope of the Decree foreign workers temporarily employed in Guinea-Bissau by foreign undertakings or international bodies is not fully consistent with this provision of the Convention. Article 2 of the Convention allows the exclusion of workers employed temporarily or intermittently in the territory of one Member on behalf of an undertaking located in the territory of another Member only under a special agreement concluded between the Members concerned. The Government indicated that, in practice, such workers have labour contracts under which they are protected by the legislation of their country of origin or the country of the undertaking or international body. The Government further stated that a bill had been drafted to regulate the conditions of foreign workers employed temporarily in Guinea-Bissau on behalf of a foreign undertaking. The Committee notes that the Government’s last report provides no information on the bill – to which the Government has been referring since 1987. It asks the Government to keep it informed of progress made in ensuring better application of this provision of the Convention.

The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the near future.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2009, published 99th ILC session (2010)

The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report has not been received. It must therefore repeat its previous observation which read as follows:

Article 1, paragraph 1, of the Convention. Equality of treatment. In its previous comments, the Committee drew the Government’s attention to section 3(1) of Decree No. 4/80 of 1981, concerning compulsory insurance against industrial accidents and occupational diseases. It pointed out that the abovementioned provision is inconsistent with the Convention in that it lays down reciprocity as a requirement for equal treatment between foreign workers employed in Guinea-Bissau and Guinean workers. In response, the Government states that the matter is still receiving its attention but that, as yet, no text has been adopted regarding the reciprocity required by section 3(1) of the abovementioned Decree. The Committee recalls in this connection that the Convention lays down a system of automatic reciprocity between member States which have ratified it. In these circumstances, it hopes that the Government will very shortly take all necessary steps to bring the abovementioned provision of its legislation into line with Article 1(1), of the Convention by ensuring that all nationals of States which have ratified this Convention are automatically afforded the same treatment as nationals of Guinea-Bissau with regard to accident compensation.

Article 1, paragraph 2. Transfer of benefits abroad. The Committee asks the Government to provide information on any compensation paid for injured persons or their dependants residing outside the country.

Article 2. Temporary or intermittent work. In its previous comments the Committee noted that section 3(3) of Decree No. 4/80 which excludes from the scope of the Decree foreign workers temporarily employed in Guinea-Bissau by foreign undertakings or international bodies is not fully consistent with this provision of the Convention. Article 2 of the Convention allows the exclusion of workers employed temporarily or intermittently in the territory of one Member on behalf of an undertaking located in the territory of another Member only under a special agreement concluded between the Members concerned. The Government indicated that, in practice, such workers have labour contracts under which they are protected by the legislation of their country of origin or the country of the undertaking or international body. The Government further stated that a bill had been drafted to regulate the conditions of foreign workers employed temporarily in Guinea-Bissau on behalf of a foreign undertaking. The Committee notes that the Government’s last report provides no information on the bill – to which the Government has been referring since 1987. It asks the Government to keep it informed of progress made in ensuring better application of this provision of the Convention.

The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the very near future.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2008, published 98th ILC session (2009)

The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report has not been received. It must therefore repeat its previous observation which read as follows:

Article 1, paragraph 1, of the Convention. In its previous comments, the Committee drew the Government’s attention to section 3(1) of Decree No. 4/80 of 1981, concerning compulsory insurance against industrial accidents and occupational diseases. It pointed out that the abovementioned provision is inconsistent with the Convention in that it lays down reciprocity as a requirement for equal treatment between foreign workers employed in Guinea-Bissau and Guinean workers. In response, the Government states that the matter is still receiving its attention but that, as yet, no text has been adopted regarding the reciprocity required by section 3(1) of the abovementioned Decree. The Committee recalls in this connection that the Convention lays down a system of automatic reciprocity between member States which have ratified it. In these circumstances, it hopes that the Government will very shortly take all necessary steps to bring the abovementioned provision of its legislation into line with Article 1, paragraph 1, of the Convention by ensuring that all nationals of States which have ratified this Convention are automatically afforded the same treatment as nationals of Guinea-Bissau with regard to accident compensation.

Article 1, paragraph 2. The Committee asks the Government to provide information on any compensation paid for injured persons or their dependants residing outside the country.

Article 2. In its previous comments the Committee noted that section 3(3) of Decree No. 4/80 which excludes from the scope of the Decree foreign workers temporarily employed in Guinea-Bissau by foreign undertakings or international bodies is not fully consistent with this provision of the Convention. Article 2 of the Convention allows the exclusion of workers employed temporarily or intermittently in the territory of one Member on behalf of an undertaking located in the territory of another Member only under a special agreement concluded between the Members concerned. The Government indicated that, in practice, such workers have labour contracts under which they are protected by the legislation of their country of origin or the country of the undertaking or international body. The Government further stated that a bill had been drafted to regulate the conditions of foreign workers employed temporarily in Guinea-Bissau on behalf of a foreign undertaking. The Committee notes that the Government’s last report provides no information on the bill – to which the Government has been referring since 1987. It asks the Government to keep it informed of progress made in ensuring better application of this provision of the Convention.

The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the very near future.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2007, published 97th ILC session (2008)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It must therefore repeat its previous observation, which read as follows:

Article 1, paragraph 1, of the Convention. In its previous comments, the Committee drew the Government’s attention to section 3(1) of Decree No. 4/80 of 1981, concerning compulsory insurance against industrial accidents and occupational diseases. It pointed out that the abovementioned provision is inconsistent with the Convention in that it lays down reciprocity as a requirement for equal treatment between foreign workers employed in Guinea-Bissau and Guinean workers. In response, the Government states that the matter is still receiving its attention but that, as yet, no text has been adopted regarding the reciprocity required by section 3(1) of the abovementioned Decree. The Committee recalls in this connection that the Convention lays down a system of automatic reciprocity between member States which have ratified it. In these circumstances, it hopes that the Government will very shortly take all necessary steps to bring the abovementioned provision of its legislation into line with Article 1, paragraph 1, of the Convention by ensuring that all nationals of States which have ratified this Convention are automatically afforded the same treatment as nationals of Guinea-Bissau with regard to accident compensation.

Article 1, paragraph 2. The Committee asks the Government to provide information on any compensation paid for injured persons or their dependants residing outside the country.

Article 2. In its previous comments the Committee noted that section 3(3) of Decree No. 4/80 which excludes from the scope of the Decree foreign workers temporarily employed in Guinea-Bissau by foreign undertakings or international bodies is not fully consistent with this provision of the Convention. Article 2 of the Convention allows the exclusion of workers employed temporarily or intermittently in the territory of one Member on behalf of an undertaking located in the territory of another Member only under a special agreement concluded between the Members concerned. The Government indicated that, in practice, such workers have labour contracts under which they are protected by the legislation of their country of origin or the country of the undertaking or international body. The Government further stated that a bill had been drafted to regulate the conditions of foreign workers employed temporarily in Guinea-Bissau on behalf of a foreign undertaking. The Committee notes that the Government’s last report provides no information on the bill – to which the Government has been referring since 1987. It asks the Government to keep it informed of progress made in ensuring better application of this provision of the Convention.

The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the very near future.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2001, published 90th ILC session (2002)

The Committee notes the information supplied by the Government in its last two reports, received in November 2000 and September 2001, respectively. It wishes to draw the Government’s attention to the following points.

Article 1, paragraph 1, of the Convention. In its previous comments, the Committee drew the Government’s attention to section 3(1) of Decree No. 4/80 of 1981, concerning compulsory insurance against industrial accidents and occupational diseases. It pointed out that the abovementioned provision is inconsistent with the Convention in that it lays down reciprocity as a requirement for equal treatment between foreign workers employed in Guinea-Bissau and Guinean workers. In response, the Government states that the matter is still receiving its attention but that, as yet, no text has been adopted regarding the reciprocity required by section 3(1) of the abovementioned Decree. The Committee recalls in this connection that the Convention lays down a system of automatic reciprocity between member States which have ratified it. In these circumstances, it hopes that the Government will very shortly take all necessary steps to bring the abovementioned provision of its legislation into line with Article 1, paragraph 1, of the Convention by ensuring that all nationals of States which have ratified this Convention are automatically afforded the same treatment as nationals of Guinea-Bissau with regard to accident compensation.

Article 1, paragraph 2. The Committee asks the Government to provide information on any compensation paid for injured persons or their dependants residing outside the country.

Article 2. In its previous comments the Committee noted that section 3(3) of Decree No. 4/80 which excludes from the scope of the Decree foreign workers temporarily employed in Guinea-Bissau by foreign undertakings or international bodies is not fully consistent with this provision of the Convention. Article 2 of the Convention allows the exclusion of workers employed temporarily or intermittently in the territory of one Member on behalf of an undertaking located in the territory of another Member only under a special agreement concluded between the Members concerned. The Government indicated that, in practice, such workers have labour contracts under which they are protected by the legislation of their country of origin or the country of the undertaking or international body. The Government further stated that a bill had been drafted to regulate the conditions of foreign workers employed temporarily in Guinea-Bissau on behalf of a foreign undertaking. The Committee notes that the Government’s last report provides no information on the bill - to which the Government has been referring since 1987. It asks the Government to keep it informed of progress made in ensuring better application of this provision of the Convention.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1999, published 88th ILC session (2000)

The Committee notes with regret that for the fourth time in succession the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

Article 1, paragraph 1, of the Convention. Further to its previous comments, the Committee notes the Government's statement that measures are to be taken at a suitable time to abolish the condition of "reciprocity" laid down in section 3 of Decree No. 4/80 of 1981, governing compulsory accident and occupational sickness insurance. In light of the importance of this provision of the Convention, the Committee hopes that the Government will take the necessary steps in the very near future to ensure that all nationals of States which have ratified this Convention are automatically granted the same treatment as the country's own nationals in respect of workmen's compensation for accident.

Article 1, paragraph 2. The Committee notes the Government's reply concerning the supply of the requested statistics on payment of compensation to victims or their dependents resident abroad. The Committee would appreciate receiving this information as soon as possible.

Article 2. With reference to its previous comments, the Committee notes the Government's statement that the project aimed at regulating the conditions of foreign workers temporarily in Guinea-Bissau in the service of a foreign undertaking has not yet been adopted. The Committee would appreciate being kept informed of any progress made in this respect.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1998, published 87th ILC session (1999)

The Committee notes with regret that for the third time in succession the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

Article 1, paragraph 1, of the Convention. Further to its previous comments, the Committee notes the Government's statement that measures are to be taken at a suitable time to abolish the condition of "reciprocity" laid down in section 3 of Decree No. 4/80 of 1981, governing compulsory accident and occupational sickness insurance. In light of the importance of this provision of the Convention, the Committee hopes that the Government will take the necessary steps in the very near future to ensure that all nationals of States which have ratified this Convention are automatically granted the same treatment as the country's own nationals in respect of workmen's compensation for accident.

Article 1, paragraph 2. The Committee notes the Government's reply concerning the supply of the requested statistics on payment of compensation to victims or their dependents resident abroad. The Committee would appreciate receiving this information as soon as possible.

Article 2. With reference to its previous comments, the Committee notes the Government's statement that the project aimed at regulating the conditions of foreign workers temporarily in Guinea-Bissau in the service of a foreign undertaking has not yet been adopted. The Committee would appreciate being kept informed of any progress made in this respect.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1997, published 86th ILC session (1998)

The Committee notes with regret that for the second time in succession the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

Article 1, paragraph 1, of the Convention. Further to its previous comments, the Committee notes the Government's statement that measures are to be taken at a suitable time to abolish the condition of "reciprocity" laid down in section 3 of Decree No. 4/80 of 1981, governing compulsory accident and occupational sickness insurance. In light of the importance of this provision of the Convention, the Committee hopes that the Government will take the necessary steps in the very near future to ensure that all nationals of States which have ratified this Convention are automatically granted the same treatment as the country's own nationals in respect of workmen's compensation for accident.

Article 1, paragraph 2. The Committee notes the Government's reply concerning the supply of the requested statistics on payment of compensation to victims or their dependents resident abroad. The Committee would appreciate receiving this information as soon as possible.

Article 2. With reference to its previous comments, the Committee notes the Government's statement that the project aimed at regulating the conditions of foreign workers temporarily in Guinea-Bissau in the service of a foreign undertaking has not yet been adopted. The Committee would appreciate being kept informed of any progress made in this respect.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1996, published 85th ILC session (1997)

The Committee notes that the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

Article 1, paragraph 1, of the Convention. Further to its previous comments, the Committee notes the Government's statement that measures are to be taken at a suitable time to abolish the condition of "reciprocity" laid down in section 3 of Decree No. 4/80 of 1981, governing compulsory accident and occupational sickness insurance. In light of the importance of this provision of the Convention, the Committee hopes that the Government will take the necessary steps in the very near future to ensure that all nationals of States which have ratified this Convention are automatically granted the same treatment as the country's own nationals in respect of workmen's compensation for accident.

Article 1, paragraph 2. The Committee notes the Government's reply concerning the supply of the requested statistics on payment of compensation to victims or their dependents resident abroad. The Committee would appreciate receiving this information as soon as possible.

Article 2. With reference to its previous comments, the Committee notes the Government's statement that the project aimed at regulating the conditions of foreign workers temporarily in Guinea-Bissau in the service of a foreign undertaking has not yet been adopted. The Committee would appreciate being kept informed of any progress made in this respect.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1995, published 82nd ILC session (1995)

With reference to its observation, the Committee notes with regret that for the fourth year in succession the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

1. Article 1, paragraph 1, of the Convention. In its earlier comments, the Committee pointed out that under section 3 of Decree No. 4/80 of 6 February 1981, governing compulsory industrial accident and occupational sickness insurance, foreign workers carrying on an occupational activity in Guinea-Bissau enjoy the same rights as Guinean workers only when there is "reciprocity of rights" between the two countries, but this was not in conformity with this Convention, since the Convention establishes a system of automatic reciprocity for all Members which have ratified it. The Committee accordingly requested that national legislation be amended to ensure that all nationals of States which have ratified this Convention are automatically granted the same treatment as the country's own nationals. The Committee also noted the Government's statement to the effect that the new Labour Code, due to come into force in 1984, would take account of this situation.

The Committee notes with regret that the new Labour Code (Act No. 2/86 of 5 April 1986) has not modified the previous situation in this respect. It also notes the Government's statement in its last report, to the effect that Decree No. 4/80 does not conflict with the Convention, as the ratification of the latter by other States is tantamount to reciprocity since the provisions of the national legislation must be read in the light of the Convention. However, the Committee wishes to point out that in both the new Labour Code and Decree No. 4/80, conditions of reciprocity are not expressly defined to take account of the commitments deriving from the ratification of the Convention. The Comittee therefore requests the Government to re-examine the situation and clarify the new Labour Code or to complete Decree No. 4/80 so as to remove all doubts in regard to the equality of protection of foreigners who are nationals of a country which has ratified the Convention.

2. Article 1, paragraph 2. The Committee takes note of the Government's statement to the effect that neither legislation nor practice provides for any condition of residence as a requirement for payment of compensation to the victims of occupational accidents or their dependants. The Committee requests the Government to supply statistical information in regard to payment of compensation to the victims of occupational accidents or their dependants in the event of residence abroad.

3. Article 2. The Committee takes note of the Government's statement to the effect that, in practice, foreign workers temporarily in Guinea-Bissau, in the service of a foreign undertaking or international body, receive employment contracts guaranteeing their protection under the legislation of their country of origin or of the country where the undertaking is situated or of the international body concerned. The Committee also notes with interest that legislation has been drafted to avoid all ambiguity in this respect. It hopes that the draft legislation will shortly be adopted and requests the Government to indicate any progress made in this regard in its next report.

4. The Committee notes with interest that, in the restructuring of the Ministry of Public Service, Labour and Social Security, the Government plans to establish a foreign workers' department to collect all the necessary information, including statistics. It hopes that in these circumstances the Government will shortly be able to indicate the number of foreign workers in Guinea-Bissau and their nationality.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1995, published 83rd ILC session (1996)

Article 1, paragraph 1, of the Convention. Further to its previous comments, the Committee notes the Government's statement that measures are to be taken at a suitable time to abolish the condition of "reciprocity" laid down in section 3 of Decree No. 4/80 of 1981, governing compulsory accident and occupational sickness insurance. In light of the importance of this provision of the Convention, the Committee hopes that the Government will take the necessary steps in the very near future to ensure that all nationals of States which have ratified this Convention are automatically granted the same treatment as the country's own nationals in respect of workmen's compensation for accident.

Article 1, paragraph 2. The Committee notes the Government's reply concerning the supply of the requested statistics on payment of compensation to victims or their dependents resident abroad. The Committee would appreciate receiving this information as soon as possible.

Article 2. With reference to its previous comments, the Committee notes the Government's statement that the project aimed at regulating the conditions of foreign workers temporarily in Guinea-Bissau in the service of a foreign undertaking has not yet been adopted. The Committee would appreciate being kept informed of any progress made in this respect.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 1995, published 82nd ILC session (1995)

With reference to its previous comments, which it has been making for a number of years, the Committee notes with regret that for the fourth year in succession the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in the request addressed directly to the Government.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1994, published 81st ILC session (1994)

With reference to its observation, the Committee notes with regret that for the third year in succession the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

1. Article 1, paragraph 1, of the Convention. In its earlier comments, the Committee pointed out that under section 3 of Decree No. 4/80 of 6 February 1981, governing compulsory industrial accident and occupational sickness insurance, foreign workers carrying on an occupational activity in Guinea-Bissau enjoy the same rights as Guinean workers only when there is "reciprocity of rights" between the two countries, but this was not in conformity with this Convention, since the Convention establishes a system of automatic reciprocity for all Members which have ratified it. The Committee accordingly requested that national legislation be amended to ensure that all nationals of States which have ratified this Convention are automatically granted the same treatment as the country's own nationals. The Committee also noted the Government's statement to the effect that the new Labour Code, due to come into force in 1984, would take account of this situation.

The Committee notes with regret that the new Labour Code (Act No. 2/86 of 5 April 1986) has not modified the previous situation in this respect. It also notes the Government's statement in its last report, to the effect that Decree No. 4/80 does not conflict with the Convention, as the ratification of the latter by other States is tantamount to reciprocity since the provisions of the national legislation must be read in the light of the Convention. However, the Committee wishes to point out that in both the new Labour Code and Decree No. 4/80, conditions of reciprocity are not expressly defined to take account of the commitments deriving from the ratification of the Convention. The Comittee therefore requests the Government to re-examine the situation and clarify the new Labour Code or to complete Decree No. 4/80 so as to remove all doubts in regard to the equality of protection of foreigners who are nationals of a country which has ratified the Convention.

2. Article 1, paragraph 2. The Committee takes note of the Government's statement to the effect that neither legislation nor practice provides for any condition of residence as a requirement for payment of compensation to the victims of occupational accidents or their dependents. The Committee requests the Government to supply statistical information in regard to payment of compensation to the victims of occupational accidents or their dependents in the event of residence abroad.

3. Article 2. The Committee takes note of the Government's statement to the effect that, in practice, foreign workers temporarily in Guinea-Bissau, in the service of a foreign undertaking or international body, receive employment contracts guaranteeing their protection under the legislation of their country of origin or of the country where the undertaking is situated or of the international body concerned. The Committee also notes with interest that legislation has been drafted to avoid all ambiguity in this respect. It hopes that the draft legislation will shortly be adopted and requests the Government to indicate any progress made in this regard in its next report.

4. The Committee notes with interest that, in the restructuring of the Ministry of Public Service, Labour and Social Security, the Government plans to establish a foreign workers' department to collect all the necessary information, including statistics. It hopes that in these circumstances the Government will shortly be able to indicate the number of foreign workers in Guinea-Bissau and their nationality.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 1994, published 81st ILC session (1994)

With reference to its previous comments, which it has been making for a number of years, the Committee notes with regret that for the third year in succession the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in the request addressed directly to the Government.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1993, published 80th ILC session (1993)

The Committee notes with regret that for the second year in succession the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

1. Article 1, paragraph 1, of the Convention. In its earlier comments, the Committee pointed out that under section 3 of Decree No. 4/80 of 6 February 1981, governing compulsory industrial accident and occupational sickness insurance, foreign workers carrying on an occupational activity in Guinea-Bissau enjoy the same rights as Guinean workers only when there is "reciprocity of rights" between the two countries, but this was not in conformity with this Convention, since the Convention establishes a system of automatic reciprocity for all Members which have ratified it. The Committee accordingly requested that national legislation be amended to ensure that all nationals of States which have ratified this Convention are automatically granted the same treatment as the country's own nationals. The Committee also noted the Government's statement to the effect that the new Labour Code, due to come into force in 1984, would take account of this situation.

The Committee notes with regret that the new Labour Code (Act No. 2/86 of 5 April 1986) has not modified the previous situation in this respect. It also notes the Government's statement in its last report, to the effect that Decree No. 4/80 does not conflict with the Convention, as the ratification of the latter by other States is tantamount to reciprocity since the provisions of the national legislation must be read in the light of the Convention. However, the Committee wishes to point out that in both the new Labour Code and Decree No. 4/80, conditions of reciprocity are not expressly defined to take account of the commitments deriving from the ratification of the Convention. The Comittee therefore requests the Government to re-examine the situation and clarify the new Labour Code or to complete Decree No. 4/80 so as to remove all doubts in regard to the equality of protection of foreigners who are nationals of a country which has ratified the Convention.

2. Article 1, paragraph 2. The Committee takes note of the Government's statement to the effect that neither legislation nor practice provides for any condition of residence as a requirement for payment of compensation to the victims of occupational accidents or their dependents. The Committee requests the Government to supply statistical information in regard to payment of compensation to the victims of occupational accidents or their dependents in the event of residence abroad.

3. Article 2. The Committee takes note of the Government's statement to the effect that, in practice, foreign workers temporarily in Guinea-Bissau, in the service of a foreign undertaking or international body, receive employment contracts guaranteeing their protection under the legislation of their country of origin or of the country where the undertaking is situated or of the international body concerned. The Committee also notes with interest that legislation has been drafted to avoid all ambiguity in this respect. It hopes that the draft legislation will shortly be adopted and requests the Government to indicate any progress made in this regard in its next report.

4. The Committee notes with interest that, in the restructuring of the Ministry of Public Service, Labour and Social Security, the Government plans to establish a foreign workers' department to collect all the necessary information, including statistics. It hopes that in these circumstances the Government will shortly be able to indicate the number of foreign workers in Guinea-Bissau and their nationality.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1992, published 79th ILC session (1992)

The Committee notes that the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

1. Article 1, paragraph 1, of the Convention. In its earlier comments, the Committee pointed out that under section 3 of Decree No. 4/80 of 6 February 1981, governing compulsory industrial accident and occupational sickness insurance, foreign workers carrying on an occupational activity in Guinea-Bissau enjoy the same rights as Guinean workers only when there is "reciprocity of rights" between the two countries, but this was not in conformity with this Convention, since the Convention establishes a system of automatic reciprocity for all Members which have ratified it. The Committee accordingly requested that national legislation be amended to ensure that all nationals of States which have ratified this Convention are automatically granted the same treatment as the country's own nationals. The Committee also noted the Government's statement to the effect that the new Labour Code, due to come into force in 1984, would take account of this situation.

The Committee notes with regret that the new Labour Code (Act No. 2/86 of 5 April 1986) has not modified the previous situation in this respect. It also notes the Government's statement in its last report, to the effect that Decree No. 4/80 does not conflict with the Convention, as the ratification of the latter by other States is tantamount to reciprocity since the provisions of the national legislation must be read in the light of the Convention. However, the Committee wishes to point out that in both the new Labour Code and Decree No. 4/80, conditions of reciprocity are not expressly defined to take account of the commitments deriving from the ratification of the Convention. The Comittee therefore requests the Government to re-examine the situation and clarify the new Labour Code or to complete Decree No. 4/80 so as to remove all doubts in regard to the equality of protection of foreigners who are nationals of a country which has ratified the Convention.

2. Article 1, paragraph 2. The Committee takes note of the Government's statement to the effect that neither legislation nor practice provides for any condition of residence as a requirement for payment of compensation to the victims of occupational accidents or their dependents. The Committee requests the Government to supply statistical information in regard to payment of compensation to the victims of occupational accidents or their dependents in the event of residence abroad.

3. Article 2. The Committee takes note of the Government's statement to the effect that, in practice, foreign workers temporarily in Guinea-Bissau, in the service of a foreign undertaking or international body, receive employment contracts guaranteeing their protection under the legislation of their country of origin or of the country where the undertaking is situated or of the international body concerned. The Committee also notes with interest that legislation has been drafted to avoid all ambiguity in this respect. It hopes that the draft legislation will shortly be adopted and requests the Government to indicate any progress made in this regard in its next report.

4. The Committee notes with interest that, in the restructuring of the Ministry of Public Service, Labour and Social Security, the Government plans to establish a foreign workers' department to collect all the necessary information, including statistics. It hopes that in these circumstances the Government will shortly be able to indicate the number of foreign workers in Guinea-Bissau and their nationality.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1988, published 75th ILC session (1988)

The Committee takes note of the information contained in the Government's report.

1. Article 1, paragraph 1, of the Convention. In its earlier comments, the Committee pointed out that under section 3 of Decree No. 4/80 of 6 February 1981, governing compulsory industrial accident and occupational sickness insurance, foreign workers carrying on an occupational activity in Guinea-Bissau enjoy the same rights as Guinean workers only when there is "reciprocity of rights" between the two countries, but this was not in conformity with this Convention, since the Convention establishes a system of automatic reciprocity for all Members which have ratified it. The Committee accordingly requested that national legislation be amended to ensure that all nationals of States which have ratified this Convention are automatically granted the same treatment as the country's own nationals. The Committee also noted the Government's statement to the effect that the new Labour Code, due to come into force in 1984, would take account of this situation.

The Committee notes with regret that the new Labour Code (Act No. 2/86 of 5 April 1986) has not modified the previous situation in this respect. It also notes the Government's statement in its last report, to the effect that Decree No. 4/80 does not conflict with the Convention, as the ratification of the latter by other States is tantamount to reciprocity since the provisions of the national legislation must be read in the light of the Convention. However, the Committee wishes to point out that in both the new Labour Code and Decree No. 4/80, conditions of reciprocity are not expressly defined to take account of the commitments deriving from the ratification of the Convention. The Comittee therefore requests the Government to re-examine the situation and clarify the new Labour Code or to complete Decree No. 4/80 so as to remove all doubts in regard to the equality of protection of foreigners who are nationals of a country which has ratified the Convention.

2. Article 1, paragraph 2. The Committee takes note of the Government's statement to the effect that neither legislation nor practice provides for any condition of residence as a requirement for payment of compensation to the victims of occupational accidents or their dependents. The Committee requests the Government to supply statistical information in regard to payment of compensation to the victims of occupational accidents or their dependents in the event of residence abroad.

3. Article 2. The Committee takes note of the Government's statement to the effect that, in practice, foreign workers temporarily in Guinea-Bissau, in the service of a foreign undertaking or international body, receive employment contracts guaranteeing their protection under the legislation of their country of origin or of the country where the undertaking is situated or of the international body concerned. The Committee also notes with interest that legislation has been drafted to avoid all ambiguity in this respect. It hopes that the draft legislation will shortly be adopted and requests the Government to indicate any progress made in this regard in its next report.

4. The Committee notes with interest that, in the restructuring of the Ministry of Public Service, Labour and Social Security, the Government plans to establish a foreign workers' department to collect all the necessary information, including statistics. It hopes that in these circumstances the Government will shortly be able to indicate the number of foreign workers in Guinea-Bissau and their nationality.

© Copyright and permissions 1996-2024 International Labour Organization (ILO) | Privacy policy | Disclaimer