ILO-en-strap
NORMLEX
Information System on International Labour Standards
NORMLEX Home > Country profiles >  > Comments > All Comments

Display in: French - Spanish

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2021, published 110th ILC session (2022)

The Committee notes that the first report of the Government on the Protocol of 2014 to the Forced Labour Convention, 1930, has not been received.  The Committee requests the Government to provide the first detailed report on the Protocol of 2014 along with its next report on the Convention, which are due in 2024.
Articles 1(1), 2(1) and 25 of the Convention. Trafficking in persons. 1. Legal and institutional framework. The Committee notes with interest the adoption of Act No. 60(I) of 2014 on Prevention and Combating of Trafficking and Exploitation of Persons and the Protection of Victims, as well as the National Action Plan against Trafficking in Persons (NAP) for 2019-2021, which provide the country with an institutional framework for the prevention and repression of trafficking and for the protection and assistance of victims. According to section 64 of the Act, the Multidisciplinary Coordination Group on Combating Human Trafficking coordinates and monitors measures and activities in the field of prevention and combatting trafficking in persons and protection of victims. The Multidisciplinary Coordination Group is responsible, among others, for monitoring and implementing the National Action Plans against Trafficking in Persons, carrying out awareness-raising activities on trafficking in persons, and the collection of data on trafficking.
The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the activities of the Multidisciplinary Coordination Group on Combating Human Trafficking as well as on the measures adopted to implement the NAP for 2019-2021, and the results achieved.
2. Law enforcement. The Committee notes that sections 8 and 9 of Act No. 60(I) of 2014 provide for penalties of imprisonment of up to 15 years for trafficking for the purpose of labour exploitation and up to 25 years for the purpose of sexual exploitation. The Committee observes from the 2020 report of the Group of Experts on Action Against Trafficking in Human Beings (GRETA) on the implementation of the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings by Cyprus that, in the period 2015–2018, a total of 58 cases of trafficking in persons were submitted by the police for prosecution, including 28 cases for the purpose of sexual exploitation and 16 cases for the purpose of labour exploitation, which resulted in nine cases of convictions in total. In this respect, the GRETA noted the low number of convictions for trafficking in persons, particularly for the purpose of labour exploitation (paragraphs 76-77, 87). The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the measures taken to ensure that all the cases of trafficking in persons, for both labour and sexual exploitation, are subject to investigations and prosecutions, and that sufficiently effective and dissuasive penalties are imposed on perpetrators. It further requests the Government to provide information on the application in practice of sections 6, 8 and 9 of Act No. 60(I) of 2014, including the number of investigations, prosecutions, convictions, and the penalties imposed.
3. Protection of victims. The Committee notes that, by virtue of section 44 of Act No. 60(I) of 2014, presumed victims of trafficking are referred to the Social Welfare Services, which shall inform them of their rights, available services, and the identification procedure. Victims of trafficking are provided with various assistance services, such as accommodation, psychological support and medical care, financial support, as well as interpretation and translation services (section 47(1)); they can claim compensation from the perpetrators of the offenses committed against them through criminal or civil proceedings (section 3); and they can benefit from legal advice and legal representation for the claim for compensation (section 36). The Committee further notes that section 62(2)(a) of the Act envisages the establishment of a victim support fund, which shall provide compensation to victims who for any reason cannot be compensated by the perpetrators.
The Committee requests the Government to provide information on: i) the number and characteristics of victims of trafficking, both for labour and sexual exploitation, and on the nature of the assistance services provided to them; ii) the cases in which courts have ordered compensation to victims of trafficking through criminal or civil proceedings; and iii) whether the victim support fund has been established.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2004, published 93rd ILC session (2005)

The Committee notes with regret that no report has been received from the Government for the third year in succession. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the following matters raised in its previous direct request:

Article 1(1) and Article 2(1) and (2)(c) of the Convention. The Committee notes the Government’s indication in the report that there are no prisons in Cyprus that are administered by private concerns, profit-making or otherwise. However, the Government indicates that, under the Prisons (General) Regulations of 1997, prisoners are transferred, after special permission, to the Guidance Centre for Outside Work and Rehabilitation, where they work outside the prison in the private sector. The Committee also notes that, under section 140 (a) and (b) of the Regulations, the prisoners who are sent to the Centre for the purpose of out-of-prison employment shall work in the free market with an employer and in work which is approved by the Committee or the Director and shall have the same terms of employment as the rest of the workers in the free market. The Government also indicates that such prisoners are paid by the company which employs them at competitive rates and are covered by the State Social Security Scheme and the Safety and Health at Work Law No. 89(1)/96 which applies to all workplaces.

While noting this information with interest, the Committee asks the Government to state, in its next report, whether the prisoners concerned offer themselves voluntarily for such employment outside prison premises, and if so, how the consent of the prisoners concerned is guaranteed, so that it is free from the menace of any penalty, including any loss of privileges or other disadvantages following from a refusal to work.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2003, published 92nd ILC session (2004)

The Committee notes with regret that no report has been received from the Government. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the following matters raised in its previous direct request:

Article 1(1) and Article 2(1) and (2)(c) of the Convention. The Committee notes the Government’s indication in the report that there are no prisons in Cyprus that are administered by private concerns, profit-making or otherwise. However, the Government indicates that, under the Prisons (General) Regulations of 1997, prisoners are transferred, after special permission, to the Guidance Centre for Outside Work and Rehabilitation, where they work outside the prison in the private sector. The Committee also notes that, under section 140 (a) and (b) of the Regulations, the prisoners who are sent to the Centre for the purpose of out-of-prison employment shall work in the free market with an employer and in work which is approved by the Committee or the Director and shall have the same terms of employment as the rest of the workers in the free market. The Government also indicates that such prisoners are paid by the company which employs them at competitive rates and are covered by the State Social Security Scheme and the Safety and Health at Work Law No. 89(1)/96 which applies to all workplaces.

While noting this information with interest, the Committee asks the Government to state, in its next report, whether the prisoners concerned offer themselves voluntarily for such employment outside prison premises, and if so, how the consent of the prisoners concerned is guaranteed, so that it is free from the menace of any penalty, including any loss of privileges or other disadvantages following from a refusal to work.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2002, published 91st ILC session (2003)

The Committee notes that no report has been received from the Government. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the following matters raised in its previous direct request:

Article 1(1) and Article 2(1) and (2)(c) of the Convention. The Committee notes the Government’s indication in the report that there are no prisons in Cyprus that are administered by private concerns, profit-making or otherwise. However, the Government indicates that, under the Prisons (General) Regulations of 1997, prisoners are transferred, after special permission, to the Guidance Centre for Outside Work and Rehabilitation, where they work outside the prison in the private sector. The Committee also notes that, under section 140 (a) and (b) of the Regulations, the prisoners who are sent to the Centre for the purpose of out-of-prison employment shall work in the free market with an employer and in work which is approved by the Committee or the Director and shall have the same terms of employment as the rest of the workers in the free market. The Government also indicates that such prisoners are paid by the company which employs them at competitive rates and are covered by the State Social Security Scheme and the Safety and Health at Work Law No. 89(1)/96 which applies to all workplaces.

While noting this information with interest, the Committee asks the Government to state, in its next report, whether the prisoners concerned offer themselves voluntarily for such employment outside prison premises, and if so, how the consent of the prisoners concerned is guaranteed, so that it is free from the menace of any penalty, including any loss of privileges or other disadvantages following from a refusal to work.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2000, published 89th ILC session (2001)

The Committee notes the Government’s report, and in particular, the information provided in reply to its general observation of 1998.

Article 1(1) and Article 2(1) and (2)(c) of the Convention.  The Committee notes the Government’s indication in the report that there are no prisons in Cyprus that are administered by private concerns, profit-making or otherwise. However, the Government indicates that, under the Prisons (General) Regulations of 1997, prisoners are transferred, after special permission, to the Guidance Centre for Outside Work and Rehabilitation, where they work outside the prison in the private sector. The Committee also notes that, under section 140 (a) and (b) of the Regulations, the prisoners who are sent to the Centre for the purpose of out-of-prison employment shall work in the free market with an employer and in work which is approved by the Committee or the Director and shall have the same terms of employment as the rest of the workers in the free market. The Government also indicates that such prisoners are paid by the company which employs them at competitive rates and are covered by the State Social Security Scheme and the Safety and Health at Work Law No. 89(1)/96 which applies to all workplaces.

While noting this information with interest, the Committee asks the Government to state, in its next report, whether the prisoners concerned offer themselves voluntarily for such employment outside prison premises, and if so, how the consent of the prisoners concerned is guaranteed, so that it is free from the menace of any penalty, including any loss of privileges or other disadvantages following from a refusal to work.

© Copyright and permissions 1996-2024 International Labour Organization (ILO) | Privacy policy | Disclaimer