ILO-en-strap
NORMLEX
Information System on International Labour Standards
NORMLEX Home > Country profiles >  > Comments > All Comments

Labour Inspection Convention, 1947 (No. 81) - Solomon Islands (Ratification: 1985)

Display in: French - Spanish

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2023, published 112nd ILC session (2024)

Previous comment

Articles 3(1)(b), 13 and 14 of the Convention. Notification of industrial accidents and cases of occupational diseases, and preventive activities of the labour inspectorate in the area of occupational safety and health. In reply to its previous comments, the Committee notes the Government’s reference to section 15 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The Committee notes that this section does not refer to the notification of occupational accidents and diseases to the labour inspectorate but to the notice to be given by the worker or on behalf of the worker to the employer or to the official under whose supervision the worker is employed, in respect of an accident, for the purpose of the application for compensation. The Committee previously noted, that, according to section 31 of the Workmen’s Compensation (Accident and Occupational Disease Return) Regulations, the employer has a duty to inform the Commissioner of Labour of any accident or disease causing death or injury within seven days of the incident. It noted in this respect that a delay of up to seven days in notice may prevent a timely investigation of serious incidents by labour inspectors. The Committee also notes that, with respect to the preventive measures adopted by labour inspectors to minimize risks of industrial accidents and cases of occupational diseases, the Government refers to section 30 of the Safety at Work Act, which provides for the power of the inspectors to issue notices of compliance. However, the Committee notes that the Government does not provide information on the measures with immediate executory force available to labour inspectors, pursuant to Article 13 of the Convention, to minimize the risk of occupational accidents and diseases. The Committee urges the Government to provide information on any measures taken to ensure the timely notification and investigation of industrial accidents and cases of occupational diseases. In addition, the Committee requests the Government to provide information on any measures taken by labour inspectors with a view to remedying defects observed in plant, layout or working methods which they may have reasonable cause to believe constitute a threat to the health or safety of the workers.
Articles 10, 11 and 16. Number of inspectors and inspections, and material means at the disposal of inspectors. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the authority that supervises the labour inspection system is the Office of the Commissioner of Labour, and that all inspectors gazetted under the Labour Act are specialized in the fields they were assigned. The Government further indicates that the Office of the Commissioner of Labour carries out two sets of inspections: proactive and reactive inspections. Proactive inspections are carried out to each undertaking referred to under the Labour Act, while reactive inspections are carried out once complaints are reported. While taking note of the information provided by the Government, the Committee notes that no information has been provided with regard to the transport and material means assigned to labour inspectors and to the reimbursement of travel expenses. Therefore, the Committee requests once again that the Government provide detailed information on the office equipment available to labour inspectors (number of offices, computers, printers, measuring devices, etc.), as well as the number of transport facilities available.It also requests the Government to provide information on the procedure for the reimbursement of travel expenses incurred by inspection officers in the performance of their duties. In addition, the Committee requests that the Government provide information on the number of inspectors, including their specialized fields.
Articles 19, 20 and 21. Annual labour inspection reports. The Government indicates that, in practice, once an inspection is carried out and completed, reports of a particular inspection are submitted to the Office of the Commissioner of Labour. It adds that these reports are important for two reasons: the first is to account for the public funds allocated and used for inspections; and the second is to act on the recommendations made by labour inspectors. While taking note of the information provided by the Government, the Committee notes once again that an annual labour inspection report containing full information on all the subjects listed in Article 21(a)–(g) of the Convention has never been received by the ILO. With reference to its general observation of 2010, the Committee once again recalls that when well prepared, the annual reports offer an indispensable basis for the evaluation of the results in practice of the activities of the labour inspection services and, subsequently, the determination of the means necessary to improve their effectiveness. Noting that in practice reports on each inspection are submitted to the Office of the Commissioner of Labour, the Committee encourages the Government to take action for the elaboration and publication of an annual report containing all the information required under Article 21 of the Convention, and to keep the Office informed of any progress made. The Committee recalls that the Government may request ILO technical assistance in this regard.
[The Government is asked to reply in full to the present comments in 2024.]

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2023, published 112nd ILC session (2024)

Previous comment

Articles 3, 7, 12 and 16 of the Convention. Functioning of the labour inspection system. The Committee notes that in reply to its previous comments, reflecting the joint observations of the representative employers’ and workers’ organizations that there was a need for capacity building of the Labour Department, the Government indicates that it will in due time consider measures for the implementation of capacity building in the area of labour inspection. The Committee refers to the discussion held during the 110th Session of the International Labour Conference, by the Conference Committee on the Application of Standards in 2022 concerning the implementation of the Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention, 1999 (No. 182), by the Solomon Islands. Among its conclusions, the Conference Committee on the Application of Standards urged the Government, in consultation with the social partners, to strengthen the capacity of law enforcement agencies and the labour inspectorate to address the worst forms of child labour and to promote their effective cooperation. The Committee therefore urges the Government to take the necessary measures to build the capacities of the labour inspection system, in light of the previous joint observations made by the social partners and the 2022 conclusions of the Conference Committee on the Application of Standards. The Committee recalls that the Government can avail itself of the technical assistance of the ILO in this regard.
The Committee is raising other matters in a request addressed directly to the Government.
[The Government is asked to reply in full to the present comments in 2024.]

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2016, published 106th ILC session (2017)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that the next report will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous comments.
Repetition
With reference to its observation, the Committee would like to raise the following additional points.
Articles 3(1)(b), 13 and 14. Notification of industrial accidents and cases of occupational diseases and preventive activities of the labour inspectorate in the area of occupational safety and health. The Committee previously noted that according to section 31 of the Workmen’s Compensation (Accident and Occupational Disease Return) Regulations, the employer has a duty to inform the Commissioner of Labour of any accident or disease causing death or injury within seven days of the incident. It also noted that a seven-day notice period may prevent a timely investigation of serious incidents by labour inspectors and recalls that the ILO code of practice on recording and notification of industrial accidents and cases of occupational disease, recommends that occupational accidents causing loss of life should be notified immediately. The Committee once again requests the Government to provide information on any steps taken or envisaged to ensure the timely notification and investigation of industrial accidents and cases of occupational diseases. It asks the Government to indicate whether this information is dealt with by the Labour Division with a view to developing a policy on prevention focusing on sectors with a high incidence of industrial accidents and cases of occupational diseases (logging industry, construction, agriculture, etc.). Please ensure that relevant statistics are included in the annual report on the work of the inspection services.
The Committee further requests the Government to supply information on any preventive measures taken by labour inspectors so as to minimize risks of industrial accidents and cases of occupational diseases, including statistics on injunctions which inspectors have imposed or have had imposed, in accordance with Article 13 of the Convention, during the period covered by the Government’s next report.
Articles 10, 11 and 16 of the Convention. Number of inspectors and inspections, and material means at the disposal of inspectors. The Committee notes the Government’s indications according to which there are currently 13 labour inspectors working at the Labour Division and that on average, 110 inspections are carried out annually. It understands from the explanations provided that labour inspectors have at their disposal, transport facilities for inspections that require them to travel by land and that, where travel by water is required, arrangements are made by the Labour Division so as to rent the required facilities or reimburse the expenses incurred by labour inspectors. The Committee asks the Government to provide detailed information on the office equipment available to labour inspectors (number of offices, computers, printers, measuring devices, etc.), as well as the number of transport facilities available.
Please also provide information on the number of cases where inspections required labour inspectors to travel by water, as well as on the total amount of travel expenses reimbursed to inspection officers in the performance of their duties during the period covered by the next report.
Articles 19, 20 and 21. Annual labour inspection reports. The Committee notes with regret that once again, an annual labour inspection report has not been received at the ILO and that an annual report containing full information on all the subjects listed in Article 21(a)–(g) of the Convention has never been received by the Office. With reference to its general observation of 2010, the Committee once again recalls that when well prepared, the annual reports offer an indispensable basis for the evaluation of the results in practice of the activities of the labour inspection services and, subsequently, the determination of the means necessary to improve their effectiveness. The Committee once again urges the Government to take all necessary measures for the elaboration and publication by the Central Labour Inspection Authority of an annual report containing all the information required under Article 21 of the Convention and to keep the Office informed of all progress made in this regard. The Committee recalls that the Government may request ILO technical assistance in this regard.
It requests the Government in any event to provide with its next report statistical information that is as detailed as possible (industrial and commercial places liable to inspection, number of inspections, violations detected and the legal provisions to which they relate, penalties imposed, statistics of industrial accidents and cases of occupational diseases, etc.).

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2016, published 106th ILC session (2017)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It is therefore bound to repeat its previous comments.
Repetition
The Committee previously noted the joint observations of the representative employers’ and workers’ organizations (the Solomon Islands Chamber of Commerce and Industry (SICCI), the Solomon Islands Chinese Association (SICA), the Solomon Islands Indigenous Business Association (SIIBA), the Solomon Islands Women in Business Association (SIWIBA), the Association of Solomon Islands Manufacturers (ASIM), the Solomon Forestry Association (SFA), the Solomon Islands Council of Trade Unions (SICTU), the Solomon Islands Public Employees’ Union (SIPEU), the Solomon Islands National Union of Workers (SINUW) and the Solomon Islands National Teachers’ Association (SINTA)). According to these observations, there was a need for capacity building of the Labour Department and the social partners on the content and application of international labour standards. The Committee invited the Government to take formal steps so as to avail itself of further ILO technical assistance aimed at capacity building in the area of labour inspection. The Committee notes that the Government does not provide any reply in relation to its comments. Accordingly, the Committee invites the Government to inform it of any measures taken aimed at capacity building in the area of labour inspection, in light of the comments of the social partners.
The Committee is raising other matters in a request addressed directly to the Government.
The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to take the necessary action in the near future.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2013, published 103rd ILC session (2014)

With reference to its observation, the Committee would like to raise the following additional points.
Articles 3(1)(b), 13 and 14. Notification of industrial accidents and cases of occupational diseases and preventive activities of the labour inspectorate in the area of occupational safety and health. The Committee previously noted that according to section 31 of the Workmen’s Compensation (Accident and Occupational Disease Return) Regulations, the employer has a duty to inform the Commissioner of Labour of any accident or disease causing death or injury within seven days of the incident. It also noted that a seven-day notice period may prevent a timely investigation of serious incidents by labour inspectors and recalls that the ILO code of practice on recording and notification of industrial accidents and cases of occupational disease, recommends that occupational accidents causing loss of life should be notified immediately. The Committee once again requests the Government to provide information on any steps taken or envisaged to ensure the timely notification and investigation of industrial accidents and cases of occupational diseases. It asks the Government to indicate whether this information is dealt with by the Labour Division with a view to developing a policy on prevention focusing on sectors with a high incidence of industrial accidents and cases of occupational diseases (logging industry, construction, agriculture, etc.). Please ensure that relevant statistics are included in the annual report on the work of the inspection services.
The Committee further requests the Government to supply information on any preventive measures taken by labour inspectors so as to minimize risks of industrial accidents and cases of occupational diseases, including statistics on injunctions which inspectors have imposed or have had imposed, in accordance with Article 13 of the Convention, during the period covered by the Government’s next report.
Articles 10, 11 and 16 of the Convention. Number of inspectors and inspections, and material means at the disposal of inspectors. The Committee notes the Government’s indications according to which there are currently 13 labour inspectors working at the Labour Division and that on average, 110 inspections are carried out annually. It understands from the explanations provided that labour inspectors have at their disposal, transport facilities for inspections that require them to travel by land and that, where travel by water is required, arrangements are made by the Labour Division so as to rent the required facilities or reimburse the expenses incurred by labour inspectors. The Committee asks the Government to provide detailed information on the office equipment available to labour inspectors (number of offices, computers, printers, measuring devices, etc.), as well as the number of transport facilities available.
Please also provide information on the number of cases where inspections required labour inspectors to travel by water, as well as on the total amount of travel expenses reimbursed to inspection officers in the performance of their duties during the period covered by the next report.
Articles 19, 20 and 21. Annual labour inspection reports. The Committee notes with regret that once again, an annual labour inspection report has not been received at the ILO and that an annual report containing full information on all the subjects listed in Article 21(a)–(g) of the Convention has never been received by the Office. With reference to its general observation of 2010, the Committee once again recalls that when well prepared, the annual reports offer an indispensable basis for the evaluation of the results in practice of the activities of the labour inspection services and, subsequently, the determination of the means necessary to improve their effectiveness. The Committee once again urges the Government to take all necessary measures for the elaboration and publication by the Central Labour Inspection Authority of an annual report containing all the information required under Article 21 of the Convention and to keep the Office informed of all progress made in this regard. The Committee recalls that the Government may request ILO technical assistance in this regard.
It requests the Government in any event to provide with its next report statistical information that is as detailed as possible (industrial and commercial places liable to inspection, number of inspections, violations detected and the legal provisions to which they relate, penalties imposed, statistics of industrial accidents and cases of occupational diseases, etc.).

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2013, published 103rd ILC session (2014)

The Committee previously noted the joint observations of the representative employers’ and workers’ organizations (the Solomon Islands Chamber of Commerce and Industry (SICCI), the Solomon Islands Chinese Association (SICA), the Solomon Islands Indigenous Business Association (SIIBA), the Solomon Islands Women in Business Association (SIWIBA), the Association of Solomon Islands Manufacturers (ASIM), the Solomon Forestry Association (SFA), the Solomon Islands Council of Trade Unions (SICTU), the Solomon Islands Public Employees’ Union (SIPEU), the Solomon Islands National Union of Workers (SINUW) and the Solomon Islands National Teachers’ Association (SINTA)). According to these observations, there was a need for capacity building of the Labour Department and the social partners on the content and application of international labour standards. The Committee invited the Government to take formal steps so as to avail itself of further ILO technical assistance aimed at capacity building in the area of labour inspection. The Committee notes that the Government does not provide any reply in relation to its comments. Accordingly, the Committee invites the Government to inform it of any measures taken aimed at capacity building in the area of labour inspection, in light of the comments of the social partners.
The Committee is raising other points in a request addressed directly to the Government.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2012, published 102nd ILC session (2013)

Further to its observation, the Committee would like to raise the following points.
Articles 10, 11 and 16 of the Convention. Number of inspectors and inspections, and material means at the disposal of inspectors. The Committee recalls that in 2006, the Government reported that the budget of the labour inspectorate and its human resources had been increased. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would provide current information on the number of labour inspectors and inspections carried out each year in relation to the number of workplaces, and the material means placed at the disposal of labour inspectors, including suitably equipped offices and transport facilities.
Article 14. Notification of industrial accidents and cases of occupational disease. The Committee notes the text of Order No. LN 74/96, The Workmen’s Compensation Act, and the accompanying Workmen’s Compensation (Accident and Occupational Disease Return) Regulations, provided in the Government’s report. This Order revokes Order No. LN137/91, of which the Committee had previously requested a copy. The Committee also notes the Holidays, Sick Leave and Passage Rules (regarding illness cover), Order No. LN19/1982. The Committee notes that according to section 31 of the Workmen’s Compensation (Accident and Occupational Disease Return) Regulations, the employer has a duty to inform the Commissioner of Labour of any accident or disease causing death or injury within seven days of the incident. The Committee notes that a seven-day notice period may prevent a timely investigation of incidents by labour inspectors and recalls that the ILO code of practice on recording and notification of industrial accidents and cases of occupational disease, recommends that occupational accidents causing loss of life should be notified immediately. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on any steps taken or envisaged to ensure the timely notification and investigation of industrial accidents and cases of occupational disease. Please also describe the role of labour inspectors in the context of the investigations, as well as any preventive measures taken or envisaged so as to minimize risks of industrial accidents and cases of occupational disease. The Committee would also appreciate if the Government would specify the penalties envisaged in law and effectively enforced for failure to give notice of occupational accidents and cases of occupational disease.
Articles 19, 20 and 21. Annual labour inspection reports. The Committee notes the limited statistics provided regarding industrial accidents as of 2009. It also notes however, that once again, an annual labour inspection report has not been received at the ILO. With reference to its general observation of 2010, the Committee recalls that when well prepared, the annual reports offer an indispensable basis for the evaluation of the results in practice of the activities of the labour inspection services and, subsequently, the determination of the means necessary to improve their effectiveness. The Committee once again urges the Government to take all necessary measures for the elaboration and publication by the Central Labour Inspection Authority of an annual report containing all the information required under Article 21 of the Convention and to keep the Office informed of all progress made in this regard. It reminds the Government that it may avail itself of ILO technical assistance in this respect if it so wishes.

Observation (CEACR) - adopted 2012, published 102nd ILC session (2013)

The Committee notes the Government’s report received by the Office on 30 September 2011, as well as the joint comments of the representative employers’ and workers’ organizations attached thereto (the Solomon Islands Chamber of Commerce and Industry (SICCI), the Solomon Islands Chinese Association (SICA), the Solomon Islands Indigenous Business Association (SIIBA), the Solomon Islands Women in Business Association (SIWIBA), the Association of Solomon Islands Manufacturers (ASIM), the Solomon Forestry Association (SFA), the Solomon Islands Council of Trade Unions (SICTU), the Solomon Islands Public Employees’ Union (SIPEU), the Solomon Islands National Union of Workers (SINUW) and the Solomon Islands National Teachers’ Association (SINTA)). According to the representative employers’ and workers’ organizations, there is a need for capacity building of the Labour Department and the social partners on the content and application of international labour standards. The Committee notes in this regard that the Government expressed its appreciation for the technical assistance provided by the Office for the preparation of article 22 reports and the facilitation of the discussion of the reports with the social partners. The Committee invites the Government to take formal steps so as to avail itself of further ILO technical assistance aimed at capacity building in the area of labour inspection and to keep the Office informed of developments in this regard.
The Committee is raising other points in a request addressed directly to the Government.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2010, published 100th ILC session (2011)

The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

The Committee notes the Government’s short report containing partial replies to the requests made by the Committee in 2000 and reiterated in 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004 on the application of Articles 10, 11, 16, 20 and 21 of the Convention. The Committee recalls that it also specifically requested a copy of Order No. LN 137/91 and the regulations concerning cover of wages (illness and accident cover) mentioned in a report on the application of the Convention received at the ILO in 1992 and requests the Government to indicate whether these texts are still in force and, if so, to supply copies.

While noting the table showing the increase in the budget of the labour inspectorate and of its human resources, the Committee observes that the annual inspection reports stated to be annexed to the Government’s report have not been received at the ILO making it impossible to appreciate to what extent effect is given to each provision of the Convention. The Government is requested to supply these annual reports as well as any report that has been prepared subsequently and in any event to provide all the information required by Parts I–V of the report form of the Convention.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2009, published 99th ILC session (2010)

The Committee notes again with regret that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

The Committee notes the Government’s short report containing partial replies to the requests made by the Committee in 2000 and reiterated in 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004 on the application of Articles 10, 11, 16, 20 and 21 of the Convention. The Committee recalls that it also specifically requested a copy of Order No. LN 137/91 and the regulations concerning cover of wages (illness and accident cover) mentioned in a report on the application of the Convention received at the ILO in 1992 and requests the Government to indicate whether these texts are still in force and, if so, to supply copies.

While noting the table showing the increase in the budget of the labour inspectorate and of its human resources, the Committee observes that the annual inspection reports stated to be annexed to the Government’s report have not been received at the ILO making it impossible to appreciate to what extent effect is given to each provision of the Convention. The Government is requested to supply these annual reports as well as any report that has been prepared subsequently and in any event to provide all the information required by Parts I–V of the report form of the Convention.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2008, published 98th ILC session (2009)

The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the following matters raised in its previous direct request:

The Committee notes the Government’s short report containing partial replies to the requests made by the Committee in 2000 and reiterated in 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004 on the application of Articles 10, 11, 16, 20 and 21 of the Convention. The Committee recalls that it also specifically requested a copy of Order No. LN 137/91 and the regulations concerning cover of wages (illness and accident cover) mentioned in a report on the application of the Convention received at the ILO in 1992 and requests the Government to indicate whether these texts are still in force and, if so, to supply copies.

While noting the table showing the increase in the budget of the labour inspectorate and of its human resources, the Committee observes that the annual inspection reports stated to be annexed to the Government’s report have not been received at the ILO making it impossible to appreciate to what extent effect is given to each provision of the Convention. The Government is requested to supply these annual reports as well as any report that has been prepared subsequently and in any event to provide all the information required by Parts I to V of the report form of the Convention.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2007, published 97th ILC session (2008)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

The Committee notes the Government’s short report containing partial replies to the requests made by the Committee in 2000 and reiterated in 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004 on the application of Articles 10, 11, 16, 20 and 21 of the Convention. The Committee recalls that it also specifically requested a copy of Order No. LN 137/91 and the regulations concerning cover of wages (illness and accident cover) mentioned in a report on the application of the Convention received at the ILO in 1992 and requests the Government to indicate whether these texts are still in force and, if so, to supply copies.

While noting with interest the table showing the increase in the budget of the labour inspectorate and of its human resources, the Committee observes that the annual inspection reports stated to be annexed to the Government’s report have not been received at the ILO making it impossible to appreciate to what extent effect is given to each provision of the Convention. The Government is requested to supply these annual reports as well as any report that has been prepared subsequently and in any event to provide all the information required by Parts I to V of the report form of the Convention.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2006, published 96th ILC session (2007)

The Committee notes the Government’s short report containing partial replies to the requests made by the Committee in 2000 and reiterated in 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004 on the application of Articles 10, 11, 16, 20 and 21 of the Convention. The Committee recalls that it also specifically requested a copy of Order No. LN 137/91 and the regulations concerning cover of wages (illness and accident cover) mentioned in a report on the application of the Convention received at the ILO in 1992 and requests the Government to indicate whether these texts are still in force and, if so, to supply copies.

While noting with interest the table showing the increase in the budget of the labour inspectorate and of its human resources, the Committee observes that the annual inspection reports stated to be annexed to the Government’s report have not been received at the ILO making it impossible to appreciate to what extent effect is given to each provision of the Convention. The Government is requested to supply these annual reports as well as any report that has been prepared subsequently and in any event to provide all the information required by Parts I to V of the report form of the Convention.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2004, published 93rd ILC session (2005)

The Committee once again notes with regret that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the points raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

The Committee notes the Government’s report for 1997 containing information in reply to its previous comments. It notes, however, that copies of neither Order LN 137/91 nor the regulations concerning cover of wages (illness and accident cover) have been supplied and requests the Government to take measures to do so.

Articles 10, 11 and 16 of the Convention. The Committee notes that inspections should be carried out twice a year for every establishment but that this frequency is not achieved because of financial constraints. Only one vehicle is available for all inspectors and labour inspectors are not reimbursed for the cost of their duty travel. The Committee notes that a request for an increased budget has been made with a view to improving the practical working conditions of labour inspectors. It would be grateful if the Government would supply information on the results of this request and on the question of installing a second inspection office in the Malaita province for the same purpose.

Articles 20 and 21. The Committee hopes that the annual inspection reports required under these provisions will shortly be published and communicated to the ILO in the time frame prescribed.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2003, published 92nd ILC session (2004)

The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

The Committee notes the Government’s report for 1997 containing information in reply to its previous comments. It notes, however, that copies of neither Order LN 137/91 nor the regulations concerning cover of wages (illness and accident cover) have been supplied and requests the Government to take measures to do so.

Articles 10, 11 and 16 of the Convention. The Committee notes that inspections should be carried out twice a year for every establishment but that this frequency is not achieved because of financial constraints. Only one vehicle is available for all inspectors and labour inspectors are not reimbursed for the cost of their duty travel. The Committee notes that a request for an increased budget has been made with a view to improving the practical working conditions of labour inspectors. It would be grateful if the Government would supply information on the results of this request and on the question of installing a second inspection office in the Malaita province for the same purpose.

Articles 20 and 21. The Committee hopes that the annual inspection reports required under these provisions will shortly be published and communicated to the ILO in the time frame prescribed.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2002, published 91st ILC session (2003)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the following matters raised in its previous direct request:

The Committee notes the Government’s report for 1997 containing information in reply to its previous comments. It notes, however, that copies of neither Order LN 137/91 nor the regulations concerning cover of wages (illness and accident cover) have been supplied and requests the Government to take measures to do so.

Articles 10, 11 and 16 of the Convention. The Committee notes that inspections should be carried out twice a year for every establishment but that this frequency is not achieved because of financial constraints. Only one vehicle is available for all inspectors and labour inspectors are not reimbursed for the cost of their duty travel. The Committee notes that a request for an increased budget has been made with a view to improving the practical working conditions of labour inspectors. It would be grateful if the Government would supply information on the results of this request and on the question of installing a second inspection office in the Malaita province for the same purpose.

Articles 20 and 21. The Committee hopes that the annual inspection reports required under these provisions will shortly be published and communicated to the ILO in the time frame prescribed.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2001, published 90th ILC session (2002)

The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

The Committee notes the Government’s report for 1997 containing information in reply to its previous comments. It notes, however, that copies of neither Order LN 137/91 nor the regulations concerning cover of wages (illness and accident cover) have been supplied and requests the Government to take measures to do so.

  Articles 10, 11 and 16 of the Convention. The Committee notes that inspections should be carried out twice a year for every establishment but that this frequency is not achieved because of financial constraints. Only one vehicle is available for all inspectors and labour inspectors are not reimbursed for the cost of their duty travel. The Committee notes that a request for an increased budget has been made with a view to improving the practical working conditions of labour inspectors. It would be grateful if the Government would supply information on the results of this request and on the question of installing a second inspection office in the Malaita province for the same purpose.

  Articles 20 and 21. The Committee hopes that the annual inspection reports required under these provisions will shortly be published and communicated to the ILO in the time frame prescribed.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2000, published 89th ILC session (2001)

The Committee notes the Government’s report for 1997 containing information in reply to its previous comments. It notes, however, that copies of neither Order LN 137/91 nor the regulations concerning cover of wages (illness and accident cover) have been supplied and requests the Government to take measures to do so.

Articles 10, 11 and 16 of the Convention.  The Committee notes that inspections should be carried out twice a year for every establishment but that this frequency is not achieved because of financial constraints. Only one vehicle is available for all inspectors and labour inspectors are not reimbursed for the cost of their duty travel. The Committee notes that a request for an increased budget has been made with a view to improving the practical working conditions of labour inspectors. It would be grateful if the Government would supply information on the results of this request and on the question of installing a second inspection office in the Malaita province for the same purpose.

Articles 20 and 21.  The Committee hopes that the annual inspection reports required under these provisions will shortly be published and communicated to the ILO in the time frame prescribed.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1996, published 85th ILC session (1997)

The Committee notes with regret that the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

The Committee notes the information provided in reply to its previous comments. It would be glad if the Government would supply a copy of Legal Notice Order LN 137/91. The Committee also requests further information on the following points:

Article 3(2) of the Convention. Please indicate any further duties given to labour inspectors, and any steps taken to ensure that the discharge of their primary duties is not prejudiced.

Article 5. Please describe the practical working of the arrangements made to promote: (a) effective cooperation between the inspection services and other governmental services, such as the health authorities; and (b) collaboration between officials of the inspectorate and employers and workers or their organizations.

Articles 10, 11 and 16. The Committee has noted the shortages of labour inspectors and facilities such as transport described in the report. There are three inspectors for over 5,000 workplaces carrying out only 30 inspections in 1991; there is no official car, and travel expenses are rarely reimbursed. The Committee recalls the requirement of the Convention that workplaces should be inspected as often and as thoroughly as necessary to ensure the effective application of legal provisions. Since available information does not seem to show that the Convention's requirements are being met satisfactorily, the Committee hopes the Government will provide full information on any measures taken or proposed to deal with these difficulties.

Article 14. The Committee has noted the information booklet on the Workmen's Compensation Act. It once again requests a copy of the Workmen's Compensation (Accident and Disease Returns) Regulations.

Articles 19, 20 and 21. The Committee has noted the information provided on the rather limited labour inspection which has taken place in 1991. It hopes the reports on inspection will be published annually and transmitted to the International Labour Office as required.

In general, the Government may wish to consider seeking the Office's advice as to how the labour inspection system might be improved.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1995, published 83rd ILC session (1996)

The Committee notes with regret that the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

The Committee notes the information provided in reply to its previous comments. It would be glad if the Government would supply a copy of Legal Notice Order LN 137/91. The Committee also requests further information on the following points:

Article 3(2) of the Convention. Please indicate any further duties given to labour inspectors, and any steps taken to ensure that the discharge of their primary duties is not prejudiced.

Article 5. Please describe the practical working of the arrangements made to promote: (a) effective cooperation between the inspection services and other governmental services, such as the health authorities; and (b) collaboration between officials of the inspectorate and employers and workers or their organizations.

Articles 10, 11 and 16. The Committee has noted the shortages of labour inspectors and facilities such as transport described in the report. There are three inspectors for over 5,000 workplaces carrying out only 30 inspections in 1991; there is no official car, and travel expenses are rarely reimbursed. The Committee recalls the requirement of the Convention that workplaces should be inspected as often and as thoroughly as necessary to ensure the effective application of legal provisions. Since available information does not seem to show that the Convention's requirements are being met satisfactorily, the Committee hopes the Government will provide full information on any measures taken or proposed to deal with these difficulties.

Article 14. The Committee has noted the information booklet on the Workmen's Compensation Act. It once again requests a copy of the Workmen's Compensation (Accident and Disease Returns) Regulations.

Articles 19, 20 and 21. The Committee has noted the information provided on the rather limited labour inspection which has taken place in 1991. It hopes the reports on inspection will be published annually and transmitted to the International Labour Office as required.

In general, the Government may wish to consider seeking the Office's advice as to how the labour inspection system might be improved.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1995, published 82nd ILC session (1995)

The Committee notes with regret that the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

The Committee notes the information provided in reply to its previous comments. It would be glad if the Government would supply a copy of Legal Notice Order LN 137/91. The Committee also requests further information on the following points:

Article 3(2) of the Convention. Please indicate any further duties given to labour inspectors, and any steps taken to ensure that the discharge of their primary duties is not prejudiced.

Article 5. Please describe the practical working of the arrangements made to promote: (a) effective cooperation between the inspection services and other governmental services, such as the health authorities; and (b) collaboration between officials of the inspectorate and employers and workers or their organizations.

Articles 10, 11 and 16. The Committee has noted the shortages of labour inspectors and facilities such as transport described in the report. There are three inspectors for over 5,000 workplaces carrying out only 30 inspections in 1991; there is no official car, and travel expenses are rarely reimbursed. The Committee recalls the requirement of the Convention that workplaces should be inspected as often and as thoroughly as necessary to ensure the effective application of legal provisions. Since available information does not seem to show that the Convention's requirements are being met satisfactorily, the Committee hopes the Government will provide full information on any measures taken or proposed to deal with these difficulties.

Article 14. The Committee has noted the information booklet on the Workmen's Compensation Act. It once again requests a copy of the Workmen's Compensation (Accident and Disease Returns) Regulations.

Articles 19, 20 and 21. The Committee has noted the information provided on the rather limited labour inspection which has taken place in 1991. It hopes the reports on inspection will be published annually and transmitted to the International Labour Office as required.

In general, the Government may wish to consider seeking the Office's advice as to how the labour inspection system might be improved.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1994, published 81st ILC session (1994)

The Committee notes that the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the following matter raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

The Committee notes the information provided in reply to its previous comments. It would be glad if the Government would supply a copy of Legal Notice Order LN 137/91. The Committee also requests further information on the following points:

Article 3(2) of the Convention. Please indicate any further duties given to labour inspectors, and any steps taken to ensure that the discharge of their primary duties is not prejudiced.

Article 5. Please describe the practical working of the arrangements made to promote: (a) effective cooperation between the inspection services and other governmental services, such as the health authorities; and (b) collaboration between officials of the inspectorate and employers and workers or their organizations.

Articles 10, 11 and 16. The Committee has noted the shortages of labour inspectors and facilities such as transport described in the report. There are three inspectors for over 5,000 workplaces carrying out only 30 inspections in 1991; there is no official car, and travel expenses are rarely reimbursed. The Committee recalls the requirement of the Convention that workplaces should be inspected as often and as thoroughly as necessary to ensure the effective application of legal provisions. Since available information does not seem to show that the Convention's requirements are being met satisfactorily, the Committee hopes the Government will provide full information on any measures taken or proposed to deal with these difficulties.

Article 14. The Committee has noted the information booklet on the Workmen's Compensation Act. It once again requests a copy of the Workmen's Compensation (Accident and Disease Returns) Regulations.

Articles 19, 20 and 21. The Committee has noted the information provided on the rather limited labour inspection which has taken place in 1991. It hopes the reports on inspection will be published annually and transmitted to the International Labour Office as required.

In general, the Government may wish to consider seeking the Office's advice as to how the labour inspection system might be improved.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1993, published 80th ILC session (1993)

The Committee notes the information provided in reply to its previous comments. It would be glad if the Government would supply a copy of Legal Notice Order LN 137/91. The Committee also requests further information on the following points:

Article 3(2) of the Convention. Please indicate any further duties given to labour inspectors, and any steps taken to ensure that the discharge of their primary duties is not prejudiced.

Article 5. Please describe the practical working of the arrangements made to promote: (a) effective cooperation between the inspection services and other governmental services, such as the health authorities; and (b) collaboration between officials of the inspectorate and employers and workers or their organizations.

Articles 10, 11 and 16. The Committee has noted the shortages of labour inspectors and facilities such as transport described in the report. There are three inspectors for over 5,000 workplaces carrying out only 30 inspections in 1991; there is no official car, and travel expenses are rarely reimbursed. The Committee recalls the requirement of the Convention that workplaces should be inspected as often and as thoroughly as necessary to ensure the effective application of legal provisions. Since available information does not seem to show that the Convention's requirements are being met satisfactorily, the Committee hopes the Government will provide full information on any measures taken or proposed to deal with these difficulties.

Article 14. The Committee has noted the information booklet on the Workmen's Compensation Act. It once again requests a copy of the Workmen's Compensation (Accident and Disease Returns) Regulations.

Articles 19, 20 and 21. The Committee has noted the information provided on the rather limited labour inspection which has taken place in 1991. It hopes the reports on inspection will be published annually and transmitted to the International Labour Office as required.

In general, the Government may wish to consider seeking the Office's advice as to how the labour inspection system might be improved.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1991, published 78th ILC session (1991)

The Committee notes with regret that the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

Article 3, paragraph 1(b) and (c) and paragraph 2, of the Convention. Please provide all available information on the measures taken and on existing provisions to give effect to these paragraphs of this Article.

Article 6. Please indicate the provisions ensuring that inspection staff have stability of employment and are independent of improper external influences.

Articles 10 and 16. The Committee notes that, according to the Government's report, the number of labour inspectors (five) is insufficient to ensure regular inspection of workplaces. Please indicate the measures taken or contemplated to increase the staff so that the inspection service can perform its duties effectively.

Article 11. Please indicate the measures taken or contemplated to improve the working conditions of labour inspectors, and existing provisions to ensure the reimbursement of travelling expenses to inspectors.

Article 19. Please indicate whether labour inspectors are required to submit to the central inspection authority periodic reports of a general nature on the results of their activities and, where applicable, to supply full particulars on the frequency and content of such reports.

Article 21. The Committee notes that the 1986 annual report on the work of the labour inspection service contains no statistics on the workplaces inspected and the number of workers employed in these establishments, on violations committed and sanctions imposed, or on occupational diseases (points (c), (e) and (g)). It hopes that future annual reports will contain all the information called for by this Article of the Convention.

Furthermore, the Committee requests the Government to transmit with its next report the regulations concerning compensation for occupational accidents and diseases the provisions of which, according to the Government's report, give effect to Article 14.

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 1990, published 77th ILC session (1990)

The Committee notes that the Government's report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:

Article 3, paragraph 1(b) and (c) and paragraph 2 of the Convention. Please provide all informaton on the measures taken and on existing provisions to give effect to these paragraphs of this Article.

Article 6. Please indicate the provisions ensuring that inspection staff have stability of employment and are independent of improper external influences.

Articles 10 and 16. The Committee notes that, according to the Government's report, the number of labour inspectors (five) is insufficient to ensure regular inspection of workplaces. Please indicate the measures taken or contemplated to increase the staff so that the inspection service can perform its duties effectively.

Article 11. Please indicate the measures taken or contemplated to improve the working conditions of labour inspectors, and existing provisions to ensure the reimbursement of travelling expenses to inspectors.

Article 19. Please indicate whether labour inspectors are required to submit to the central inspection authority periodic reports of a general nature on the results of their activities and, where applicable, to supply full particulars on the frequency and content of such reports.

Article 21. The Committee notes that the 1986 annual report on the work of the labour inspection service contains no statistics on the workplaces inspected and the number of workers employed in these establishments, on violations committed and sanctions imposed, or on occupational diseases (points (c), (e) and (g)). It hopes that future annual reports will contain all the information called for by this Article of the Convention.

Furthermore, the Committee requests the Government to transmit with its next report the regulations concerning compensation for occupational accidents and diseases the provisions of which, according to the Government's report, give effect to Article 14.

© Copyright and permissions 1996-2024 International Labour Organization (ILO) | Privacy policy | Disclaimer