All Comments

Home Page | Français | Español |

ILO is a United Nations Agency

RSS Feed | Newsroom | Contact us

NORMLEX

Information System on International Labour Standards

Instruments
Key documents
Ratification of ILO Conventions
Supervising the application of International Labour Standards: Supervision by country; Search comments by the supervisory bodies; Complaint procedures; Freedom of association cases; Representations (Art. 24); Commission of Inquiry (Art. 26)
Regular reporting
Country profiles
Comparatives
Maritime Labour Convention (2006)

MLC, 2006

NATLEX *new look*
National Legislation on Labour and Social Rights

LEGOSH
Global database on occupational safety and health legislation

EPLex
Employment protection legislation database

Compendium of court decisions

NORMLEX Home > Country profiles > > Comments > All Comments

Holidays with Pay Convention, 1936 (No. 52) - Egypt (Ratification: 1954)

Display in: French - Spanish

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2023, published 112nd ILC session (2024)

Previous comments: C.1, C.14, C.30 and C.106

In order to provide a comprehensive view of the issues relating to the application of the ratified Conventions on working time, the Committee considers it appropriate to examine Conventions Nos 1 (hours of work in industry), 30 (hours of work in commerce and offices) 14 (weekly rest in industry), 106 (weekly rest in commerce and offices), 52 (holidays with pay),101 (holidays with pay in agriculture) and 89 (night work for women) in a single comment.

Hours of work

Articles 6(1) of Convention No. 1 and 7(1) of Convention No. 30. Permanent exceptions. Intermittent work. In its previous comment on Convention No. 30, the Committee noted that section 1 of Ministerial Order No.115 of 2003 determines the works that are considered intermittent by nature, by enumerating a broad range of activities (including transportation, rest houses, storekeepers, farm crops, vegetable, fruits, and fish wholesale) in which workers may be required to stay at the workplace more than ten but less than 12 hours a day, recalling that inherently “intermittent work” for which permanent exceptions to the normal hours of work are possible, should be defined narrowly (General Survey of 2018, paragraph 94). Noting that the Government’s report does not refer to any legislative or regulatory development on this matter, the Committee requests the Government to take appropriate action to ensure that the categories of workers subject to permanent exceptions to the normal hours of work be strictly limited to those whose duties are essentially within the meaning of “intermittent workers” under the Convention.

Articles 6(2) of Convention No. 1 and 7(3) of Convention No. 30. Temporary exceptions. Limits to overtime. In its previous comment on Convention No. 30, the Committee requested the Government to specify which legal provisions set out the maximum number of additional hours of work in a year. In its report, the Government referred to Ministerial Order No.115 of 2003 and Ministerial Order No. 113 of 2003, both setting out a maximum of twelve hours a day. The Committee recalls that the Conventions require the imposition of a limit on the additional hours of work that are authorized, not only in the day, but also in the year, and for these additional hours to be kept within reasonable limits in line with the general goal of the instruments to establish the eight-hour day and the 48-hour week as a legal standard for hours of work (General Survey of 2018, paragraph 148). The Committee therefore requests the Government to take appropriate action to impose a limit on the additional hours of work that are authorized in the year.

Articles 8 of Convention No. 1 and 11 and 12 of Convention No. 30. 1. Records. In its previous comment on Convention No. 30, the Committee requested the Government to indicate whether employers are required to maintain records of additional hours of work performed. In its report, the Government refers to the manual of procedures of the Labour Inspection Department and to section 45 of the Labour Code providing that workers sign a register to receive their wage which includes the items of the wage. While taking note of this information, the Committee requests the Government to specify whether any, and if so which, specific provisions of the legislation impose an obligation on employers to record the workers’ additional hours.

2. Sanctions. The Committee notes that section 249 of the Labour Code provides for a fine in case of the employer’s violations of the provisions on hours of work of not less than a hundred Egyptian pounds (EGP) and not exceeding two hundred EGP. With reference to its General Survey of 2018 (paragraph 871), the Committee encourages the Government to evaluate whether these sanctions are proportionate to the offences and sufficiently dissuasive to deter violations.

Weekly rest

Articles 4 of Convention No. 14 and 7 and 8 of Convention No. 106. Special weekly rest schemes. Following its previous comment on Convention No. 106, the Committee notes that the Government does not report on the possibility of amending section 84 of the Labour Code which permits the accumulation of weekly rest days over a period of eight weeks in enterprises located in remote areas as well as in continuous processes. Recalling that workers under special weekly rest schemes should not work without rest for more than three weeks (see Paragraph 3(a) of the Weekly Rest (Commerce and Offices) Recommendation, 1957 (No. 103)), the Committee requests the Government to take appropriate action, including through the amendment of section 84 of the Labour Code, to ensure that rest periods are granted at reasonably short intervals.

Article 10(2) of Convention No. 106. Sanctions. The Committee notes that section 249 of the Labour Code provides for a fine in case of employer’s violation of the provisions on weekly rest of not less than a hundred EGP and not exceeding two hundred EGP. With reference to its General Survey of 2018 (paragraph 871), the Committee encourages the Government to evaluate whether these sanctions are proportionate to the offences and sufficiently dissuasive to deter violations.

Annual leave

Articles 3 of Convention No. 52, and 7 of Convention No. 101. Holiday remuneration. The Committee recalls that the Conventions provide for the possibility that workers taking holiday receive their usual remuneration including the cash equivalent to their remuneration in kind. Noting that the Labour Code is silent on this issue, the Committee requests the Government to provide information on whether the legislation provides for the possibility that workers taking holiday receive the cash equivalent to their remuneration in kind.

Articles 7 and 8 of Convention No. 52 and 10 of Convention 101. Sanctions. The Committee notes that section 247 and 249 of the Labour Code provide for a fine of not less than a hundred EGP and not exceeding five hundred EGP if the employer fails to grant annual leave, and for a fine of not less than a hundred EGP and not exceeding two hundred EGP if the employer fails to comply with the rules related to record-keeping. In reference to its General Survey of 2018 (paragraph 871), the Committee encourages the Government to evaluate whether these sanctions are proportionate to the offences and sufficiently dissuasive to deter violations.

Women ’ s night work

Articles 2 and 3 of Convention No. 89. General prohibition against women’s night work in industrial undertakings. The Committee welcomes the adoption of Decree No. 43 of 2021 on occupations in which women cannot be employed that revised Ministerial Decree No. 183 of 2003 on the employment of women on night shifts so as to allow night work for women (section 1) and the adoption of Decree No. 44 of 2021 regarding women’s night work shifts that provides for alternatives to night work for women after and before childbirth to protect the health of the mother and the child. Noting that the country is still bound by the Night Work (Women) (Revised) Convention, 1948 (No. 89), and recalling that this Convention will be open for denunciation between 27 February 2031 and 27 February 2032, the Committee draws the Government’s attention to the Night Work Convention, 1990 (No. 171), which is not devised as a gender-specific instrument but focuses on the protection of all those working at night (2018 General Survey on Working Time, paragraph 408).

Direct Request (CEACR) - adopted 2008, published 98th ILC session (2009)

The Committee notes that sections 47–53 of the new Labour Code, Act No. 12 of 2003, essentially reproduce sections 43–49 of the previous Labour Code, Act No. 137 of 1981, providing for a period of 21 days of annual paid leave that may be increased to 30 days for workers with ten or more years of service and workers over 50 years of age.

Article 7 of the Convention. Records. The Committee notes that section 77 of the Labour Code requires the employer to establish a file for each worker containing, among other information, the date of entry into service and an indication of all leaves obtained. The Committee requests the Government to indicate whether there is a standard form for maintaining such record, as required by this Article of the Convention and, if so, to transmit a specimen copy of that form.

Article 8. Sanctions. The Committee notes that sections 247 and 249 of the Labour Code prescribe a fine of between 100 Egypt Pounds (EGP) and EGP500 (approximately US$18 and US$90) for failure to grant annual leave, and a fine of between EGP100 and EGP200 for infringement of the rules related to record-keeping. Recalling that monetary sanctions must be established and periodically readjusted at a level that is truly dissuasive and effective in preventing infringements of the relevant legislation, the Committee requests the Government to clarify whether the current level of fines provided for in the Labour Code is considered adequate to ensure compliance with the national legislation in respect of annual leave.

Part V of the report form. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would provide together with its next report up to date information on the practical application of the Convention, including, for instance, statistics on the number of workers covered by the relevant legislation, labour inspection results showing the number of offences observed and penalties imposed in connection with workers’ annual leave entitlement, copies of any collective agreements containing provisions on annual leave, etc.

Finally, the Committee takes this opportunity to recall that, based on the conclusions and proposals of the Working Party on Policy regarding the Revision of Standards, the ILO Governing Body has decided that Convention No. 52 is an outdated instrument and consequently States parties to this Convention should be invited to denounce it and ratify at the same time the more recent Holidays with Pay Convention (Revised), 1970 (No. 132), (see GB.283/LILS/WP/PRS/1/2, paragraph 12). The acceptance of the obligations of Convention No. 132 in respect of employed persons in economic sectors other than agriculture by a State party to Convention No. 52 involves the immediate denunciation of the latter. The ratification of Convention No. 132 appears to be all the more appropriate as the legislation of Egypt, which provides for paid annual leave of 21 days, is clearly more favourable than the requirements of Convention No. 52. The Committee requests the Government to keep the Office informed of any decision taken or envisaged concerning the possible ratification of Convention No. 132.