National Legislation on Labour and Social Rights
Global database on occupational safety and health legislation
Employment protection legislation database
Display in: French - Spanish
Previous comment
Articles 1, 2 and 3 of the Convention. Discrimination based on sex. The Committee recalls its previous comments relating to the Legal Capacity of Married Persons Act of 2006, and notes in this regard the activities under the Project on Gender Equality in Economic Rights to raise public awareness about the Act and to increase knowledge and build the capacity of stakeholders and decision-makers, as well as of the relevant authorities in implementing institutions. It also notes that training on gender equality and economic rights has been provided to the presidents and magistrates of the court, and that implementing guidelines on the Act will be developed, including a review of the court’s decisions, if any, on its interpretation of the Act. The Committee asks the Government to continue to provide information on the activities under the Project on Gender Equality in Economic Rights with a view to ensuring the full implementation of the Legal Capacity of Married Persons Act, and its impact on women’s employment and access to occupations. Please also provide a copy of the implementing guidelines of the Act. The Government is also requested to indicate any measures taken specifically to prevent continued application of customary law regarding marital powers restricting women’s equality in employment and occupation.
Sexual harassment. The Committee notes from the Government’s report that some training on sexual harassment is being given by the Directorate of Dispute Prevention and Resolution (DDPR) to workers and employers, and that a number of enterprises have developed sexual harassment policies or are providing training on its prevention. However, data on the actual number of enterprises that have developed such policies are not yet available. The Committee encourages the Government to work together with workers and employers, and their organizations, to gather examples of good practices on workplace measures to prevent sexual harassment in line with the code of practice on sexual harassment, and to provide information on any steps taken in this regard. Please also provide information on any other measures taken to promote the implementation of the code of practice, as well as information on the impact of the training held by the DDPR. Please continue to provide information on the enforcement of the Labour Code’s provisions prohibiting sexual harassment, including relevant court decisions.
Equality of opportunity and treatment between men and women. The Committee recalls the Government’s intention to set up a gender commission and establish a women’s credit scheme to stimulate self-employment. The Decent Work Country Programme (2006–09) also indicated that job cuts in the textile industry severely impacted on women’s employment opportunities, and job creation had been identified as a priority area to be addressed. The Committee notes that neither the gender commission nor the women’s credit scheme have been established, but that an ILO Project on Women’s Entrepreneurship Development and Gender Equality (WEDGE) is being implemented as part of the Decent Work Country Programme; training on entrepreneurship skills is apparently also being provided by the Ntlafatso Skills Training Centre. The Government further indicates that programmes promoting women’s participation in governance and leadership aim to achieve 50 per cent representation of women in all sectors of government (presently at 30 per cent), and that the Gender and Development Policy 2003 is under review. The Committee asks the Government to provide information on any progress made in the review of the Gender and Development Policy 2003, and it hopes the revised policy will include specific measures to promote equality of opportunity and treatment between men and women in employment and occupation. The Committee also requests the Government to indicate any action taken to ensure that men and women benefit from job-creation programmes on an equal footing, as well as the specific results secured by the action to promote women’s entrepreneurship. In this regard, please include information on the number of women that are participating in entrepreneurship skills training and on those who have succeeded in establishing their own business. Please also provide statistical information, disaggregated by sex, on employment in all sectors of government.
Equality of opportunity and treatment irrespective of race, colour and national extraction. With respect to its previous comments regarding the Race Relations Bill, 2004, and practical measures to ensure equality of opportunity and treatment for all workers protected by the Convention, the Committee notes the Government’s statement that no further action has been taken on the Bill, as there do not seem to be any serious problems of race relations in the country. The Committee draws the attention of the Government to the obligation under the Convention to take active measures to ensure that all workers, including Basotho and Asian ethnic workers, are protected against discrimination and enjoy equality of opportunity and treatment irrespective of race, colour or national extraction. The Committee asks the Government to take steps to examine the employment situation of the different ethnic communities, including with respect to the impact of any existing or newly emerging forms of discrimination, and to provide information on the progress made in this regard. Please also provide detailed information on any measures to promote and more proactively ensure equality in employment and occupation, irrespective of race, colour and national extraction.
Article 3(a). Cooperation with workers’ and employers’ organizations. The Committee notes the brief information provided by the Government regarding training by the Ministry of Justice, Human Rights and Constitutional Affairs on issues of non-discrimination. The Committee asks the Government to take more active steps to seek the cooperation of the social partners, as well as of other relevant institutions, with a view to determining specific measures to promote equality at work.
Enforcement. The Committee notes from the Government’s report that the Labour Court and Labour Appeal Court cases can now be consulted online. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would collect and supply the relevant judicial decisions specifically relating to discrimination in employment and occupation, including those relying on the Convention. Please also provide information on relevant decisions or reports of the labour inspectorate.
Articles 1 and 2 of the Convention. Sexual harassment. The Committee notes from the Government’s report that only one case of sexual harassment has been lodged before the labour court so far. The case was withdrawn before the court could hear it. The Committee requests the Government to continue to provide information on the enforcement of the Labour Code’s provisions prohibiting sexual harassment, including relevant court decisions. The Committee reiterates its request for information on the implementation of the code of practice on sexual harassment in the workplace issued by the Ministry of Labour and Employment. Please indicate how the code of practice is being promoted and whether any information is available on the number of enterprises that have taken workplace measures to prevent sexual harassment in line with the code.
Enforcement. The Committee notes the decision of the labour court in the case of Letsika and Others vs. National University of Lesotho, in which the Court has relied on the Convention. The Committee requests the Government to continue to provide information on any judicial or administrative decisions relating to discrimination in employment and occupation, including relevant decisions or reports of the labour inspectorate.
Articles 1, 2 and 3(c) of the Convention. Discrimination on the basis of sex. The Committee recalls its previous comments concerning the fact that, under customary law and in common law, married women were considered to be minors and therefore could not conclude a contract, open a bank account, obtain a loan or apply for a passport without their husband’s consent. In this regard, the Committee notes with satisfaction that the Legal Capacity of Married Persons Act enacted in 2006 repeals “common law, customary law and any other marriage rules in terms of which a husband acquires marital powers over the person and property of his wife” (section 3(1)). The Committee notes that the Act removes restrictions on the legal capacity of married women as regards the following: (a) entering into a contract; (b) suing or being sued; (c) registering immovable property in her name; (d) acting as an executive of a deceased’s estate; (e) acting as a trustee of an estate; (f) acting as a director of a company; (g) binding herself as surety; and (h) performing any other act which was restricted by any law due to marital power before the commencement of the Act (section 3(3)). The Act also provides for spouses “married in community of property” to have equal powers (section 5). The Committee requests the Government to provide detailed information on the measures taken to ensure the Act’s full implementation and on its impact on women’s employment and access to occupations. In this regard, the Committee requests the Government to provide information on any judicial decisions issued enforcing the Act’s provisions and on the measures taken to raise awareness of the Act. The Committee also requests the Government to provide information on any measures taken specifically to prevent continued application, in practice, of customary law regarding marital powers restricting women’s equality in employment and occupation.
Measures to promote equality of opportunity and treatment of men and women in employment and occupation. The Committee recalls its previous comments concerning the participation of men and women in the labour market, requesting the Government to provide information on the measures taken to ensure that men and women enjoy equal employment opportunities in all sectors and industries, based on merit and excluding stereotypical considerations. In this regard, the Committee notes that, during the Extraordinary Meeting of the African Union Conference of Ministers of Gender and Women’s Affairs held in Maseru on 18 December 2008, the Prime Minster announced plans to set up a Gender Commission which would provide support for the implementation of the 2003 Gender and Development Policy and that the ministry responsible for gender issues is establishing a women’s credit scheme to stimulate self-employment. The Decent Work Country Programme (2006–09) document indicates that job cuts in the textile industry severely impacted on women’s job opportunities and identifies job creation as a priority area to be addressed. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the establishment of the Gender Commission and its activities to promote gender equality in employment and occupation, the implementation of the women’s credit scheme, as well as information on any other measures taken to promote and ensure equality of opportunity and treatment of men and women in employment and occupation. In this context, the Committee requests the Government to indicate the measures taken to ensure that men and women benefit from job-creation programmes on an equal footing. Noting that updated information on the participation of men and women in employment is not yet available, the Committee requests the Government to provide such data as soon as possible.
Equality of opportunity and treatment irrespective of race, colour or national extraction. The Committee previously noted that a Race Relations Bill, 2004, had been drafted which prohibits racial discrimination in respect of access to schools, services and public facilities. The Committee had also noted information concerning ethnic tensions between the Basotho and ethnic Asian communities, including at the workplace. In this regard, the Committee notes from the Government’s report that no further developments have occurred with regard to practical measures to ensure equality of opportunity and treatment of all workers in Lesotho, irrespective of race, colour or national extraction. The Committee requests the Government to indicate whether any progress has been made with regard to adopting legislation addressing racial discrimination. Please also provide information on the employment situation of the various ethnic communities, and on any measures taken to promote and ensure equality in employment and occupation, irrespective of race, colour or national extraction.
Article 3(a). Cooperation with workers’ and employers’ organizations. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that it had not yet been able to take any action to seek the cooperation of workers’ and employers’ organizations with a view to promoting the application of the Convention. The Committee encourages the Government to take active steps to seek the cooperation of the social partners with a view to discussing and deciding on specific measures to promote equality at work, including through awareness raising and training on the principles of the Convention and the non-discrimination provisions contained in the legislation. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on any measures taken to this end.
The Committee is raising other points in a request addressed directly to the Government.
The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:
1. Article 1 of the Convention. Discrimination on the basis of sex. The Committee recalls its previous comments concerning the fact that, under customary law and in common law, women are considered to be minors and cannot therefore conclude a contract, open a bank account, obtain a loan or apply for a passport without their husband’s consent. In this regard, the Committee notes the Government’s assurance that women in fact can conclude employment contracts, open bank accounts and apply for passports without the consent of their husbands. The Committee also notes the Government’s statement that, in practice, customary law is never applied in employment relationships, whether they are formal or informal. Furthermore, the Committee notes that the Married Persons Equality Bill proposed by the Lesotho Law Reform Commission has not yet been adopted. The Committee considers that efforts to ensure equality of opportunity and treatment of men and women in employment and occupation must go hand in hand with promoting gender equality in society at large. The Government is therefore asked to continue to provide information on the measures taken to abolish any discriminatory laws or practices that may impede the full application of the Convention and to pursue legal reform with a view to ensure equal rights of men and women, including progress made in adopting the Married Persons Equality Bill.
2. Sexual harassment. Recalling its 2002 general observation, the Committee notes the information provided by the Government on sexual harassment. It notes in particular that sexual harassment at work is prohibited pursuant to sections 5(2) and 200 of the Labour Code Order No. 24 of 1992. In 2003, the Minister of Labour and Employment issued a Code of Good Practice on sexual harassment in the workplace which contains provisions defining sexual harassment. The Code also sets out recommendations on how employers should prevent and address such behaviour at the workplace and deals with formal and informal mechanisms for conflict resolution and guidance as to the available remedies available under the law. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the practical application of the relevant provisions of the Labour Code and the Code of Good Practice.
3. Discrimination on the basis of political opinion. In reply to the Committee’s previous comments concerning the application of sections 13(a) and 14(1)(k) of the Public Service Act of 1999 in practice, the Government states that under these provisions public servants are not prevented from being members of political parties but they are not allowed to hold executive or senior positions within their parties and cannot stand for election. Furthermore, the Government states that public servants cannot do anything, which taints their loyalty and allegiance to the Government in furtherance of their political party interest. The Committee notes these explanations and requests the Government to inform it of any past or future disciplinary measures taken against a public servant (sections 13(a) and 14(1)(k) of the Public Service Act of 1999), including any related administrative or judicial decisions.
4. Article 2. National policy to promote equality of opportunity and treatment in employment and occupation. Recalling that the National Employment Policy prepared by the Ministry of Labour and Employment in 2002 provided for free choice of work and equal opportunities, the Committee notes that the Government has never adopted the Policy. However, the Committee also notes from the Government’s report that it is still committed to ensuring that there is no discrimination in employment and occupation on the basis of race, colour, sex, religion, political opinion, national extraction or social origin. In this regard, the Committee notes the Government’s statement that it is undertaking to implement the measures set out in Article 3 during 2005 and would provide a report to the Committee on the progress made. Recalling that the Constitution and the Labour Code contain non-discrimination provisions, the Committee stresses the need for the Government to take concrete and proactive steps to promote equality and ensure non-discrimination in practice. The Committee thus looks forward to receiving additional information from the Government on the measures taken to declare and pursue a national equality policy as required under Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention.
5. Equality of opportunity and treatment of men and women. The Committee notes from the Employment and Earnings Survey 1996/1997 that 45.1 per cent of formal sector employees were men, while 54.9 per cent were women. Women outnumber men in the private and public formal sector, while more men than women are employed in the parastatal sector. The under-representation of men in the formal sector appears to be as a result of the importance of the manufacturing sector in which some 80 per cent of workers are women. In this regard, the Committee notes from the Government’s report that complaints were made by men to the Labour Department, alleging that they were not given equal opportunities to seek employment in the textile and leather industry. The Government states that the complainants where unable to prove their allegation and that the labour force in this industry was traditionally female. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the measures taken to ensure that men and women enjoy equal employment opportunities in all sectors and industries, based on merit and excluding stereotypical considerations. The Government is also asked to provide up to date statistical information on the position of men and women in the formal and informal employment and work, including statistical information on the number of employees by industry and occupational groups, disaggregated by sex.
6. Equality of opportunity and treatment irrespective of race, colour or national extraction. Recalling its previous comments concerning existing ethnic tensions between the Basotho and ethnic Asian communities, the Committee notes that the Government’s statement that tensions between the Basotho and employers of Chinese origin were mainly caused by communication barriers and cultural differences and that the Ministry of Labour has been raising the issue in training sessions with workers and employers in the textile industry in order to reduce incidence of unfair dismissals, e.g. by establishing effective grievance procedures and encouraging communication. The Committee also notes that the Government has elaborated a Race Relations Bill, 2004, which prohibits racial discrimination in access to public places, the use of public facilities or services, and schools. The Committee requests the Government to continue to promote information on the practical measures taken to ensure the enjoyment of equality of opportunity and treatment of all workers in Lesotho, irrespective of race, colour, and national extraction.
7. Article 3(a). Cooperation with employers’ and workers’ organizations and other appropriate bodies. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that it is planning to take action to seek the cooperation of workers and employers with a view to encouraging the application of the Convention in 2005. It asks the Government to provide information on the concrete steps taken and any results achieved.
8. Article 4. Measures affecting individuals suspected of, or engaged in activities prejudicial to the security of the State. The Committee notes the Government’s reply to its previous direct request confirming that persons affected in their employment and occupation by measures taken against them for state security reasons have recourse to the High Court sitting as constitutional court. Noting that the Government is not aware of any such complaints made, the Committee asks the Government to inform it of any relevant cases that may be brought before the High Court in the future.
9. Parts II and IV of the report form. The Government is requested to provide information on the measures taken by the competent authorities monitor and enforce the legislative provisions applying the Convention, particularly section 5 of the Labour Code Order. Please indicate the number, nature and outcome of cases concerning employment discrimination dealt by the authorities.
The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:
4. Article 2. National policy to promote equality of opportunity and treatment in employment and occupation. Recalling that the National Employment Policy prepared by the Ministry of Labour and Employment in 2002 provided for free choice of work and equal opportunities – the Committee notes that the Government has never adopted the Policy. However, the Committee also notes from the Government’s report that it is still committed to ensuring that there is no discrimination in employment and occupation on the basis of race, colour, sex, religion, political opinion, national extraction or social origin. In this regard, the Committee notes the Government’s statement that it is undertaking to implement the measures set out in Article 3 during 2005 and would provide a report to the Committee on the progress made. Recalling that the Constitution and the Labour Code contain non-discrimination provisions, the Committee stresses the need for the Government to take concrete and proactive steps to promote equality and ensure non-discrimination in practice. The Committee thus looks forward to receiving additional information from the Government on the measures taken to declare and pursue a national equality policy as required under Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention.
4. Article 2. National policy to promote equality of opportunity and treatment in employment and occupation. Recalling that the National Employment Policy prepared by the Ministry of Labour and Employment in 2002 provided for free choice of work and equal opportunities - the Committee notes that the Government has never adopted the Policy. However, the Committee also notes from the Government’s report that it is still committed to ensuring that there is no discrimination in employment and occupation on the basis of race, colour, sex, religion, political opinion, national extraction or social origin. In this regard, the Committee notes the Government’s statement that it is undertaking to implement the measures set out in Article 3 during 2005 and would provide a report to the Committee on the progress made. Recalling that the Constitution and the Labour Code contain non-discrimination provisions, the Committee stresses the need for the Government to take concrete and proactive steps to promote equality and ensure non-discrimination in practice. The Committee thus looks forward to receiving additional information from the Government on the measures taken to declare and pursue a national equality policy as required under Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention.
5. Equality of opportunity and treatment of men and women. The Committee notes from the Employment and Earnings Survey 1996/1997 that 45.1 per cent of formal sector employees were men, while 54.9 per cent were women. Women outnumber men in the private and public formal sector, while more men than women are employed in the parastatal sector. The under-representation of men in the formal sector appears to be as a result of the importance of the manufacturing sector in which some 80 per cent of workers are women. In this regard, the Committee notes from the Government’s report that complaints were made by men to the Labour Department, alleging that they were not given equal opportunities to seek employment in the textile and leather industry. The Government states that the complainants where unable to prove their allegation and that the labour force in this industry was traditionally female. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on the measures taken to ensure that men and women enjoy equal employment opportunities in all sectors and industries, based on merit and excluding stereotypical considerations. The Government is also asked to provide up-to-date statistical information on the position of men and women in the formal and informal employment and work, including statistical information on the number of employees by industry and occupational groups, disaggregated by sex.
6. Equality of opportunity and treatment irrespective of race, colour or national extraction. The Committee notes from the 1996/1997 Employment and Earnings Survey that out of 71,668 paid employees, 1,124 were non-Basotho. Recalling its previous comments concerning existing ethnic tensions between the Basotho and ethnic Asian communities, the Committee notes that the Government’s statement that tensions between the Basotho and employers of Chinese origin were mainly caused by communication barriers and cultural differences and that the Ministry of Labour has been raising the issue in training sessions with workers and employers in the textile industry in order to reduce incidence of unfair dismissals, e.g. by establishing effective grievance procedures and encouraging communication. The Committee also notes that the Government has elaborated a Race Relations Bill, 2004, which prohibits racial discrimination in access to public places, the use of public facilities or services, and schools. The Committee requests the Government to continue to promote information on the practical measures taken to ensure the enjoyment of equality of opportunity and treatment of all workers in Lesotho, irrespective of race, colour, and national extraction.
1. Article 1 of the Convention. In its previous request, the Committee noted that article 18, paragraph 4(b) and (c), of the Constitution stipulate that in certain matters, particularly in marriage, divorce, devolution of property or those matters which fall within the scope of customary law, it was possible to derogate from the application of the principle of equality of opportunity and treatment laid down in paragraph 1 of article 18. The Committee deemed it cause for concern that the abovementioned provisions authorized the application of legislative texts and laws, including customary law, which were discriminatory and therefore incompatible with the present Convention to the extent that they had an impact on employment and occupation. It noted, for example, that in customary law and in common law women are considered to be minors and cannot therefore conclude a contract, open a bank account, obtain a loan or apply for a passport without their husband’s consent. The Committee wished to be reassured that the application of customary law did not hinder the implementation of the principle of equality of opportunity and treatment with respect to employment and occupation as regards the grounds covered by the Convention.
2. Further to the above, the Committee notes that Consultation Paper No. 1 (2000) of the Law Reform Commission proposes the adoption of a "Married Persons Equality Bill". It notes that section 3(1)(a) of the Bill repeals the common law, customary law and any other marriage rules in terms of which a husband acquires the marital power over the person and property of his wife; subsection (1)(b) immediately abolishes the marital power which any husband has over the person and property of his wife. Further, section 4(a) of the Bill provides that the effect of the marital power would be to remove the restrictions which the marital power places on the legal capacity of his wife, among others, to contract and to perform any other act which was restricted by any law due to the marital power. Further, subsection (b) abolishes the common law and customary law positions where the husband is regarded as head of the family by virtue of the marital power. Considering the possible positive impact the adoption of the Bill could have on the application of the Convention, the Committee asks the Government to indicate whether the Bill has been adopted, and if so, provide copies of the Bill, as well as any information regarding its practical impact on the promotion of equality of opportunity and treatment in regard to the employment and occupation of women. Noting, nevertheless, that the Government’s report does not include sufficient information to enable the Committee to assess the relationship between customary law and common law in practice and in what manner the Government ensures that application of customary law does not hinder the implementation of the principle of equality of opportunity and treatment with respect to employment and occupation in regard to any person because of their sex, race, colour, religion, political opinion, national extraction or social origin, the Committee hopes that such information will be included in the Government’s next report.
3. Discrimination on the basis of political opinion. The Committee notes that the Government does not reply to its previous comment in which it noted that section 13(a) of the Public Service Act, 1995, requires absolute and undivided loyalty on the part of public officers in regard to the Constitution and the Government. It also noted that section 14(1)(k), of the Act restricts considerably the right of public officers to express or demonstrate their political opinions. The Committee, therefore, reiterates its request to the Government to supply information on the manner in which this provision is applied in practice.
4. Discrimination on the basis of colour, race or national extraction. The Committee notes that the Government does not provide any information with respect to its previous comments in which it noted the Government’s statements to the United Nations committee (CERD/C/337/Add.1, paragraph 16) affirming the existence on its territory of a small minority of Basothos of Indian origin, as well as the observations of the committee (CERD/C/56/Misc.39/Rev.3, paragraph 5) to the effect that there is tension between Lesotho nationals and certain factory owners of Asian and South African origin. The Committee reiterates its request to the Government to supply information on measures taken to calm relations between these communities and promote equality in employment. The Committee would also be grateful if the Government would supply information on the ethnic composition of the population of Lesotho.
5. Article 2. In its previous direct request, the Committee pointed out that, in addition to the legal context, positive measures were needed to eliminate discrimination in practice. It recalled that articles 26 and 30 of the Constitution of Lesotho require the Government to adopt policies aimed at promoting a society based on equality and justice for all its citizens regardless of race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status, as well as policies aimed at securing just and favourable conditions of work and, in particular, policies directed to achieving equal opportunities for men and women in regard to employment. In this regard, the Committees notes from the attached documentation the adoption of a comprehensive employment policy aiming, among others, "to ensure that there is freedom of choice in employment and the fullest opportunity for each worker to qualify for, and to use his [or her] skills and endowments in, a job for which he [or she] is well suited, irrespective of race, colour, sex, religion, political opinion, national extraction and social origin"; and that "the basis rights and interests of workers are safeguarded and, to that end, discriminatory laws are abolished". The Committee also notes that the policy includes a number of strategies related to, among others, promoting rural employment, employment creation, skills development and equal opportunities for men and women, improving working conditions and enhancing the participation of employers and workers. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the measures taken and envisaged under the national employment policy to ensure the implementation of the constitutional provisions on equality and non-discrimination, in legislation as well as in practice, especially with respect to employment creation, working conditions, skills development of women but also of other more vulnerable groups. It also requests the Government to indicate in what other manner it envisages to eliminate effectively discrimination in employment and occupation on the basis of race, colour, sex, religion, political, opinion, national extraction and social origin.
6. The Committee notes the statistical data provided by the Government on the number of employees in the different activities of the manufacturing industry. However, as the statistics do not indicate the numbers of men and women employed in the various companies, nor the specific positions they occupy, it is impossible for the Committee to evaluate the extent to which the Convention is applied in the manufacturing industry or any other sectors of the economy. The Committee requests the Government to indicate, in its next report, the respective numbers of men and women in the various activities of the manufacturing industry, as well as to provide any other statistics enabling it to ascertain the distribution between men and women - horizontally as well as vertically - in the various categories of employment and sectors of activity. Further, noting also from the attached documentation that the Central Bureau for Statistics will conduct surveys periodically on the labour force in the formal and the informal sectors of the economy and carry out particular surveys related to the informal sector and to micro- and small-scale enterprises, with particular attention being paid to women, the Committee asks the Government to provide copies of any surveys undertaken, and hopes that the Government will be able, next time, to provide information on the participation of the various components of the working population, both quantitatively and qualitatively, and in particular the most vulnerable social groups.
7. The Committee notes that the Government’s report does not reply to a number of other points it has made in its previous direct request, which read as follows:
1. The Committee notes that in 1993 the Government instituted a Law Reform Commission with the mandate of examining the laws not compatible with the new Constitution, proposing the repeal of archaic laws and reformulating laws. It notes that the Human Rights Service of the Ministry of Justice also has the mandate of ensuring that national legislation is compatible with international instruments relating to human rights. It also notes the establishment of an Ombudsman’s Office in 1996 which may be advised of violations of fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution. In this regard, the Committee emphasizes the lack of provisions expressly prohibiting discrimination on the basis of the seven criteria set out in the Convention and recalling the sanctions incurred in the event of violation of this principle in the Public Service Act of 1995 (particularly in the section relating to recruitment and promotion) or in the 1984 Act on Technical and Vocational Training (particularly in regard to guidance and access to certain occupations). The Committee therefore requests the Government to supply information on the activities of these various bodies, where they are linked to the promotion and application of equality of opportunity and treatment and to indicate whether the National Human Rights Commission, charged with investigating any violation of human rights, has finally been established.
2. Article 3. The Committee notes the statement in the Government’s report that there is no discrimination in Lesotho within the meaning of the Convention, hence there is no need to adopt laws or education programmes to encourage acceptance and application of the national policy of equality of opportunity and treatment in employment. The Committee recalls that the promotion of equality of occupation and treatment does not apply to a static situation which can be addressed in a definitive manner, but to an ongoing process during which the national policy of equality must adjust to the changes it makes in society to succeed in eliminating the many distinctions, exclusions or preferences based on the criteria set forth in the Convention. The Committee therefore invites the Government to implement actively the measures set out in Article 3(a), (b), (c), (d) and (e) of the Convention, particularly in regard to education and raising of public awareness to the occurrence of discrimination in employment based on unlawful grounds.
3. The Committee requests the Government to supply information on its methods of cooperation with employers’ and workers’ organizations with a view to encouraging the acceptance and application of this Convention. It also requests copies of some of the collective agreements in force in the public and private sectors.
4. Article 4. The Committee notes the Government’s statement to the effect that there are no legislative or administrative measures governing the employment or occupation of persons suspected of, or engaged in, activities prejudicial to the security of the State. It nevertheless requests the Government to indicate what recourse is open to these persons and whether complaints of this nature have already been examined.
5. The Committee wishes to know whether there are occupations - in the public service and the private sector - which are not accessible to women (other than underground work). If so, it requests the Government to provide it with a detailed list.
The Committee hopes that the Government will make every effort to provide the requested information in its next report.
The Committee notes the information provided by the Government in its report, which is identical to the previous report, except for the attached documentation.
The Committee notes the Government’s first two reports on the application of the Convention and expresses the hope that in its next report it will supply detailed information on the following points.
1. Article 1 of the Convention. The Committee notes with interest that the Constitution of Lesotho enshrines the principle of non-discrimination in general (articles 4 and 18), while section 5 of the Labour Code reproduces almost word for word Article 1 of the Convention and thus guarantees equality of opportunity and treatment in employment and occupation. It notes, however, that article 18, 4(b) and 4(c), of the Constitution stipulates that in certain matters, particularly in marriage, divorce, devolution of property or those matters which fall within the scope of customary law, it is possible to derogate from the application of the principle of equality of opportunity and treatment laid down in paragraph 1 of article 18. The Committee deems it cause for concern that the abovementioned provisions authorize the application of legislative texts and laws, including customary law, which are discriminatory and therefore incompatible with the present Convention to the extent that they have an impact on employment and occupation. It notes, for example, that in customary law and in common law women are considered to be minors and cannot therefore conclude a contract, open a bank account, obtain a loan or apply for a passport without their husband’s consent. The Committee would therefore be grateful if the Government would indicate whether customary law on these matters has been codified and, if so, to provide it with a copy of the relevant provisions. It requests the Government to indicate the relationship between customary law and common law in practice and in what manner it ensures that application of customary law does not hinder the implementation of the principle of equality of opportunity and treatment in regard to the employment and occupation of women, but also in regard to any person because of their race, colour, religion, political opinion, national extraction or social origin.
2. The Committee wishes to obtain information on the participation of the various components of the working population, both quantitatively and qualitatively, and in particular the most vulnerable social groups. In this regard, the Committee would be grateful if the Government would indicate whether the data collected by virtue of section 17 of the Labour Code is disaggregated by sex, in which case it requests the Government to send it a copy of the statistics enabling it to ascertain the distribution between men and women - horizontally as well as vertically - in the various categories of employment and sectors of activity.
3. Discrimination on the basis of political opinion. The Committee notes that section 13(a) of the Public Service Act, 1995, requires absolute and undivided loyalty on the part of public officers in regard to the Constitution and the Government. It also notes that section 14(1)(k), of the Act restricts considerably the right of public officers to express or demonstrate their political opinions. It therefore requests the Government to supply information on the manner in which this provision is applied in practice.
4. Discrimination on the basis of colour, race or national extraction. The Committee notes the Government’s statements to the United Nations Committee (CERD/C/337/Add.1, paragraph 16) affirming the existence on its territory of a small minority of Basothos of Indian origin as well as the observations of the Committee (CERD/C/56/Misc.39/Rev.3, paragraph 5) to the effect that there is tension between Lesotho nationals and certain factory owners of Asian and South African origin. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would supply information on measures taken to calm relations between these communities and promote equality in employment. The Committee would be grateful if the Government would supply information on the ethnic composition of the population of Lesotho.
5. Article 2. The Committee notes the Government’s statement to the effect that this Article is fully applied in that the Constitution (article 18), forbids discrimination on all the seven grounds listed in the Convention, affirms the principle of equality before the law (article 19) and provides the possibility that victims of discrimination may apply to the High Court for relief (article 22). Although affirmation of the principle of equality, incorporation of the Convention in the national legal order and the absence of laws or administrative measures expressly instituting inequality constitute an essential feature of the national policy laid down in Article 2 of the Convention, they do not however suffice to satisfy the obligations of the Convention, which is aimed at the effective elimination of all discrimination. The Committee is of the view that, although the legal context is important, it does not in itself suffice to dispel discrimination in fact as certain forms of discrimination stem from behaviour, attitudes or the display of prejudice which can be eliminated only by the adoption of positive measures. The Committee recalls that under article 26 of the Constitution of Lesotho the Government is required to adopt policies aimed at promoting a society based on equality and justice for all its citizens regardless of race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status, and that article 30 of the Constitution provides for the adoption of policies aimed at securing just and favourable conditions of work and, in particular, policies directed to achieving equal opportunities for men and women in regard to employment. The Committee therefore requests the Government to indicate in what manner it envisages implementing the abovementioned constitutional provisions, in legislation as well as in practice.
6. The Committee notes that in 1993 the Government instituted a Law Reform Commission with the mandate of examining the laws not compatible with the new Constitution, proposing the repeal of archaic laws and reformulating laws. It notes that the Human Rights Service of the Ministry of Justice also has the mandate of ensuring that national legislation is compatible with international instruments relating to human rights. It also notes the establishment of an Ombudsman’s Office in 1996 which may be advised of violations of fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution. In this regard, the Committee emphasizes the lack of provisions expressly prohibiting discrimination on the basis of the seven criteria set out in the Convention and recalling the sanctions incurred in the event of violation of this principle in the Public Service Act of 1995 (particularly in the section relating to recruitment and promotion) or in the 1984 Act on Technical and Vocational Training (particularly in regard to guidance and access to certain occupations). The Committee therefore requests the Government to supply information on the activities of these various bodies, where they are linked to the promotion and application of equality of opportunity and treatment and to indicate whether the National Human Rights Commission, charged with investigating any violation of human rights, has finally been established.
7. Article 3. The Committee notes the statement in the Government’s report that there is no discrimination in Lesotho within the meaning of the Convention, hence there is no need to adopt laws or education programmes to encourage acceptance and application of the national policy of equality of opportunity and treatment in employment. The Committee recalls that the promotion of equality of occupation and treatment does not apply to a static situation which can be addressed in a definitive manner, but to an ongoing process during which the national policy of equality must adjust to the changes it makes in society to succeed in eliminating the many distinctions, exclusions or preferences based on the criteria set forth in the Convention. The Committee therefore invites the Government to implement actively the measures set out in Article 3(a), (b), (c), (d) and (e) of the Convention, particularly in regard to education and raising of public awareness to the occurrence of discrimination in employment based on unlawful grounds.
8. The Committee requests the Government to supply information on its methods of cooperation with employers’ and workers’ organizations with a view to encouraging the acceptance and application of this Convention. It also requests copies of some of the collective agreements in force in the public and private sectors.
9. Article 4. The Committee notes the Government’s statement to the effect that there are no legislative or administrative measures governing the employment or occupation of persons suspected of, or engaged in, activities prejudicial to the security of the State. It nevertheless requests the Government to indicate what recourse is open to these persons and whether complaints of this nature have already been examined.
10. The Committee wishes to know whether there are occupations - in the public service and the private sector - which are not accessible to women (other than underground work). If so, it requests the Government to provide it with a detailed list.