National Legislation on Labour and Social Rights
Global database on occupational safety and health legislation
Employment protection legislation database
Display in: French - Spanish
The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:
The Committee notes that the Government’s report contains no information in relation to Parts III and IV of the report form. It notes the comments of the Czech‑‑Moravian Confederation of Trade Unions (CMKOS), received at the ILO on 25 October 2004 and forwarded to the Government on 1 November 2004, on the application of the Convention. While welcoming the provisions of the new Employment Act in so far as they reflect significant strengthening of active employment policy tools, the CMKOS fears that labour offices may become responsible for other areas of labour policy to the detriment of their core activities, in an environment marked by an alarming rate of unemployment. The Committee notes the short response of the Government. It requests the Government to provide detailed information on the reasons underlying its position.
The Committee will examine at its next appropriate session the information previously requested, together with any information the Government will provide in relation to the comments by the CMKOS.
[The Government is asked to reply in detail to the present comments in 2010.]
The Committee notes that the Government’s report contains no information in relation to Parts III and IV of the report form. It notes the comments of the Czech-Moravian Confederation of Trade Unions (CMKOS), received at the ILO on 25 October 2004 and forwarded to the Government on 1 November 2004, on the application of the Convention. While welcoming the provisions of the new Employment Act in so far as they reflect significant strengthening of active employment policy tools, the CMKOS fears that labour offices may become responsible for other areas of labour policy to the detriment of their core activities, in an environment marked by an alarming rate of unemployment. The Committee notes the short response of the Government. It requests the Government to provide detailed information on the reasons underlying its position.
The Committee notes the Government’s first report on the measures taken to apply the Convention and the copy of Act No. 174 of 1968, as amended up to 2002, on the state technical supervision on occupational safety.
The Committee also notes the information disseminated on the Government’s web site concerning the development of a national employment policy. In particular, it notes with interest the creation of a government council for human resources development and the adoption, by Government resolution No. 210 of 3 March 2003, of a human resources development strategy. Noting that the above council’s main responsibility is to coordinate and ensure cooperation between the central administrative authorities of the State, local government bodies involved in the field of human development, employers’ and workers’ organizations and other competent bodies and entities, and also that the pilot programme for implementation of the human resources development strategy will be submitted to the Government at the end of March 2004, the Committee requests the Government to provide, for the period covered by the next report, information on any developments in the system of labour administration as requested under each of the Articlesand in Parts III-VI of the report form of the Convention.