National Legislation on Labour and Social Rights
Global database on occupational safety and health legislation
Employment protection legislation database
Display in: French - Spanish
The Committee notes that the Government’s report contains no reply to its previous comments. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that the next report will include full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:
Article 1(c) of the Convention. Penal sanctions involving compulsory labour applicable to public officials for neglect of duty. Referring to its earlier comments, the Committee has noted the Government’s explanations concerning the interpretation of section 159(1) of the Penal Code, under which a public official who by negligence thwarts (foils) or makes substantially more difficult (obstructs) the execution of an important task shall be punishable with imprisonment (which involves compulsory prison labour, under the legislation on the execution of prison sentences). The Government indicates that section 159(1) is applicable only in serious cases of violation of a public officer’s obligations, such as foiling or substantial obstruction of a significant task related to the officer’s authoritative and decision-making power. The Committee has also noted the information on the application of section 159(1) in practice, including the information on the number of sentences of imprisonment pronounced in 2003–05 and extracts of two court decisions imposing sentences of imprisonment for acts which may amount to abuse of authority by police officers.
While having duly noted this information, the Committee observes that section 159(1) of the Penal Code is worded in very general terms, broad enough to be likely to fall within the scope of the Convention. The Committee refers in this connection to the explanations contained in paragraphs 175–178 of its General Survey of 2007 on the eradication of forced labour, in which it considered that sanctions involving compulsory labour for breaches of labour discipline (including neglect of duty by public employees) may be compatible with the Convention only if such breaches impair or are liable to endanger the operation of essential services or which are committed either in the exercise of functions that are essential to safety or in circumstances where life or health are in danger. On the other hand, it may be recalled that, in so far as the labour discipline is concerned, it is always possible, without contravening the Convention, to have recourse to other disciplinary penalties, which do not include compulsory labour.
The Committee therefore reiterates its hope that measures will be taken, on the occasion of the future revision of the Penal Code, to amend section 159(1) so as to restrict its application to essential services in the strict sense of the term (that is, services, the interruption of which would endanger the life, personal safety or health of the whole or part of the population) or, more generally, to circumstances where the life or health of persons are in danger. Pending the adoption of such measures, the Committee requests the Government to continue to provide the information on the application of the above provision in practice, including copies of the relevant court decisions and indicating the penalties imposed.
The Committee notes that the Government’s report has not been received. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the matters raised in its previous direct request, which read as follows:
Article 1, subparagraph c, of the Convention. Penal sanctions involving compulsory labour applicable to public officials for neglect of duty. Referring to its earlier comments, the Committee has noted the Government’s explanations concerning the interpretation of section 159(1) of the Penal Code, under which a public official who by negligence thwarts (foils) or makes substantially more difficult (obstructs) the execution of an important task shall be punishable with imprisonment (which involves compulsory prison labour, under the legislation on the execution of prison sentences). The Government indicates that section 159(1) is applicable only in serious cases of violation of a public officer’s obligations, such as foiling or substantial obstruction of a significant task related to the officer’s authoritative and decision-making power. The Committee has also noted the information on the application of section 159(1) in practice, including the information on the number of sentences of imprisonment pronounced in 2003–05 and extracts of two court decisions imposing sentences of imprisonment for acts which may amount to abuse of authority by police officers.
The Committee has noted the Government’s reply to its earlier comments. It has noted with interest Government Decree No. 500/2000, which repealed Government Decree No. 284/1992 concerning measures of economic mobilization, communicated by the Government with its report. The Committee has also noted the Government’s clarifications concerning section 97(1) of the Penal Code, including the information on its application in practice.
Article 1(c) of the Convention. Disciplinary measures involving compulsory labour applicable to public officials. Referring to its earlier comments on the subject, the Committee has noted the Government’s indications concerning the definition of a "public official" (section 89(9) of the Penal Code) and the application of section 158(1) of the Penal Code. However, as regards section 159(1) of the Penal Code, according to which a public official who by negligence thwarts or makes substantially more difficult the execution of an important task shall be punishable with imprisonment (which involves compulsory prison labour), the Committee draws the Government’s attention to the explanations contained in paragraphs 110-116 of its General Survey of 1979 on the abolition of forced labour, in which it considered that sanctions involving compulsory labour for breaches of labour discipline may be compatible with the Convention only if such breaches impair or are liable to endanger the operation of essential services or which are committed either in the exercise of functions that are essential to safety or in circumstances where life or health are in danger. The Committee therefore hopes that measures will be taken, on the occasion of the future revision of the Penal Code, to amend section 159 so as to restrict its application to essential services in the strict sense of the term (that is, services whose interruption would endanger the life, personal safety or health of the whole or part of the population) or, more generally, to circumstances where the life or health of persons are in danger. Pending the revision, the Committee requests the Government to continue to provide information on the application of the above provision in practice, including copies of court decisions defining or illustrating its scope.
1. The Committee has noted the information provided by the Government in reply to its earlier comments, including a number of legislative texts supplied by the Government. It has noted with interest the Government’s indication in the report that Government Decree No. 284 of 1992, concerning measures of economic mobilization to increase defensive capacity in times of threat or in normal conditions, to which the Committee referred in its previous direct request, was repealed by Government Decree No. 500/2000, which entered into force on 31 December 2000. The Committee would appreciate it if the Government would supply a copy of the repealing Decree with its next report.
2. The Committee has also noted the Government’s reply to the observations made by the International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU) in October 2001, which it has been examining in its comments made under Convention No. 29, likewise ratified by the Czech Republic.
3. The Committee has noted the provisions of sections 158(1)(c) and 159(1) of the Criminal Code, according to which a public official who fails to fulfil a duty pursuant to his office or whose negligence thwarts or makes substantially difficult the execution of an important task shall be punishable with imprisonment (which involves an obligation to perform prison labour pursuant to section 29(1) of the Imprisonment Act No. 169/1999 SB of 30 June 1999). The Committee requests the Government to provide, in its next report, the information on the application of the above provisions in practice, including copies of court decisions defining or illustrating their scope, so as to enable the Committee to assess their conformity with Article 1(c) of the Convention.
4. The Committee has noted a provision of section 97(1) of the Criminal Code, which makes punishable with imprisonment (involving compulsory labour) any act (such as abuse of employment, profession, position or office, etc.) causing a breakdown in the work of a state organ or economic organization or other institution. The Committee would appreciate it if the Government would provide information on the application of this provision in practice, supplying copies of the court decisions defining or illustrating its scope, so as to enable the Committee to ascertain whether this provision is not applicable in the situations covered by Article 1(d).
1. The Committee notes a communication received in October 2001 from the International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU), which contains observations concerning the application of the Convention by the Czech Republic. It notes that this communication was forwarded to the Government in November 2001 for any comments it might wish to make on the matters raised therein. It hopes that the Government’s comments will be supplied in its next report, so as to enable the Committee to examine them at its next session.
2. The Committee notes that no report has been received from the Government. It hopes that a report will be supplied for examination by the Committee at its next session and that it will contain full information on the following matters raised in its previous direct request:
1. The Committee has noted with interest the information provided by the Government in its first reports on the application of the Convention. It would be grateful if the Government would supply, with its next report, copies of the legislation in force in the following fields: updated and consolidated text of the Criminal Code; the laws governing the press and assemblies, meetings and demonstrations; the law governing political parties; the law governing the civil service; and any provisions governing labour discipline in merchant shipping. With reference to its 1998 direct request under Convention No. 87, the Committee requests the Government, in the light of the elaboration of new legislation concerning strikes, to supply information on any provisions restricting the right to strike and which may be enforced with sanctions involving an obligation to work. 2. The Committee has noted Government Decree No. 284 of 1992 concerning measures of economic mobilization which shall be applied to meet the needs of the armed forces and the population in order to increase the State’s defensive capacity and also in various other situations of crisis (such as natural calamity, ecological catastrophe, etc.). It has noted that "economic mobilization subjects" (which may include corporate and natural persons) shall set up defence units and shall propose a certain number of workers and officials for such units (sections 1(2) and 8(1) and (2)). According to section 4(2) of the Decree, construction projects in respect of the mobilization infrastructure may be used not only in the eventual situation of expected threat, but also in normal conditions. The Committee asks the Government to indicate, in its next report, on what terms workers and officials proposed for such units may be called upon to work there, and to supply copies of any provisions governing this matter, including copies of any rules or regulations made under the provisions of Decree No. 284, so as to enable the Committee to ascertain the observance of Article 1(b) of the Convention. Please also provide information on the application of the abovementioned Decree in practice.
1. The Committee has noted with interest the information provided by the Government in its first reports on the application of the Convention. It would be grateful if the Government would supply, with its next report, copies of the legislation in force in the following fields: updated and consolidated text of the Criminal Code; the laws governing the press and assemblies, meetings and demonstrations; the law governing political parties; the law governing the civil service; and any provisions governing labour discipline in merchant shipping. With reference to its 1998 direct request under Convention No. 87, the Committee requests the Government, in the light of the elaboration of new legislation concerning strikes, to supply information on any provisions restricting the right to strike and which may be enforced with sanctions involving an obligation to work.
2. The Committee has noted Government Decree No. 284 of 1992 concerning measures of economic mobilization which shall be applied to meet the needs of the armed forces and the population in order to increase the State’s defensive capacity and also in various other situations of crisis (such as natural calamity, ecological catastrophe, etc.). It has noted that "economic mobilization subjects" (which may include corporate and natural persons) shall set up defence units and shall propose a certain number of workers and officials for such units (sections 1(2) and 8(1) and (2)). According to section 4(2) of the Decree, construction projects in respect of the mobilization infrastructure may be used not only in the eventual situation of expected threat, but also in normal conditions. The Committee asks the Government to indicate, in its next report, on what terms workers and officials proposed for such units may be called upon to work there, and to supply copies of any provisions governing this matter, including copies of any rules or regulations made under the provisions of Decree No. 284, so as to enable the Committee to ascertain the observance of Article 1(b) of the Convention. Please also provide information on the application of the abovementioned Decree in practice.
2. The Committee has noted Government Decree No. 284 of 1992 concerning measures of economic mobilization which shall be applied to meet the needs of the armed forces and the population in order to increase the State's defensive capacity and also in various other situations of crisis (such as natural calamity, ecological catastrophe, etc.). It has noted that "economic mobilization subjects" (which may include corporate and natural persons) shall set up defence units and shall propose a certain number of workers and officials for such units (sections 1(2) and 8(1) and (2)). According to section 4(2) of the Decree, construction projects in respect of the mobilization infrastructure may be used not only in the eventual situation of expected threat, but also in normal conditions. The Committee asks the Government to indicate, in its next report, on what terms workers and officials proposed for such units may be called upon to work there, and to supply copies of any provisions governing this matter, including copies of any rules or regulations made under the provisions of Decree No. 284, so as to enable the Committee to ascertain the observance of Article 1(b) of the Convention. Please also provide information on the application of the abovementioned Decree in practice.