Solicitud directa (CEACR) - Adopción: 1995, Publicación: 83ª reunión CIT (1996)

1. Article 2(1) and (4) and Article 4 of the Convention. In previous comments, the Committee noted that under section 132, paragraph 2, of the Labour Code of 1984, workers may opt to take accumulated holidays in respect of two consecutive years. The Committee notes the Government's reply in its report that the Higher Labour Council which has just been established will examine problems linked with labour regulation in general. The Committee recalls that under the Convention every person to whom the Convention applies shall be entitled to an annual holiday with pay of at least six working days (Article 2(1) and Article 4 of the Convention) and that, consequently, only the part of the holiday which exceeds the minimum duration may be postponed (Article 2(4)). It hopes that the Government will indicate the measures taken or envisaged to bring legislation into conformity with the Convention on this point.

2. Article 2(3)(b). The Committee had noted previously that under section 126, paragraph 3, of the Labour Code, in the calculation of holiday rights absences due to occupational accident or disease and - for up to six months - due to certified illness are regarded as actual service. It noted the Government's statement that, although occupational illness occurring during holidays falls within section 126, paragraph 3, and is accordingly regarded as actual service in the calculation of holidays due, no such provision at present exists concerning other illness occurring during holidays. Noting that the Government states that it wishes to provide specific information in its next report on the subject of section 126, paragraph 3, of the Labour Code, the Committee hopes that this information will apply to measures taken or envisaged to implement this provision of the Convention.