Observación (CEACR) - Adopción: 2012, Publicación: 102ª reunión CIT (2013)

Convenio sobre la inspección del trabajo, 1947 (núm. 81) - Eswatini (Ratificación : 1981)

Otros comentarios sobre C081

Observación

Solicitud directa

Visualizar en: Francés - EspañolVisualizar todo

Articles 2, 3(1) and (2), 10, 11, 16 and 17 of the Convention. Functioning and resources of the labour inspection system. The Committee notes from the limited information provided in the Government’s report that the total number of inspections increased from 2,866 in 2009 to 3,548 in 2010, thus contributing, according to the Government, to a better awareness of national labour standards among employers. The Government refers to a single targeted inspection campaign conducted in the apparel industry during the reporting period and specifies that labour inspectors only carry out inspections pursuant to complaints due to the lack of transport facilities. According to the Government, despite the purchase of new cars, all the vehicles have been grounded due to cash flow problems. The Government also indicates that despite the fact that it has managed to fill all vacancies in the labour inspectorate, there is still need to establish new posts as the number of workplaces liable to inspection is increasing.

The Committee notes with regret that the Government’s report does not provide the information previously requested by the Committee on the steps taken or envisaged for the amendment or abrogation of the provisions of section 82 of the Industrial Relations Act and sections 1, 2, 4, and 5 of the Guidelines for intervention by the Commissioner of Labour, so that the Commissioner of Labour may be exempted from carrying out functions of conciliation and resolution of industrial disputes. The Committee refers to Article 3(1) and (2) of the Convention and notes that these functions are likely to interfere with the effective discharge of the primary enforcement and advisory duties of labour inspectors as identified in Article 3(1), or prejudice the authority and impartiality which are necessary to inspectors in their relations with employers and workers. In this respect, the Committee recalls the orientation provided by the Labour Inspection Recommendation, 1947 (No. 81), according to which the labour inspectors’ functions should not include that of acting as conciliator or arbitrator in labour disputes. The Committee therefore once again urges the Government to take the necessary measures so as to bring the Industrial Relations Act and the Guidelines for intervention by the Commissioner of Labour into conformity with Article 3(2) of the Convention by clearly dissociating the inspection and conciliation functions, so that labour inspectors can focus on their primary duties under Article 3(1), and to keep the ILO informed of all progress made in this regard.

Articles 20 and 21 of the Convention. Annual report. The Committee notes that no annual report of the Department of Labour has been received in the ILO since 2005 under Article 20 of the Convention. The Committee requests the Government to indicate the measures taken or envisaged in order to recommence the publication and regular communication to the ILO of annual reports of the Department of Labour which should contain the information listed in Article 21 of the Convention, including detailed information on the part of the activities of the Commissioner of Labour which concern the enforcement of legal provisions relating to conditions of work and the protection of workers as provided for in Article 3(1)(a) and (b). In the absence of an annual report, the Committee requests the Government to provide detailed information on the number of workplaces liable to inspection and the number of workers employed therein, the staff of the labour inspection service, statistics of inspection visits, violations detected and penalties imposed, as well as data on industrial accidents and cases of occupational disease.

The Committee recalls moreover that recommendations towards strengthening the labour inspection system of Swaziland were made by the ILO as early as 2005 in the framework of the “Improving Labour Systems in Southern Africa” (ILSSA) project. The Committee requests the Government to provide information on any steps taken or envisaged as a follow-up to these recommendations, and encourages the Government to continue to avail itself of ILO technical assistance, including in order to obtaining support in its research for the necessary funds in the framework of international cooperation, with a view to the progressive establishment of a labour inspection system which meets the requirements of the Convention.

The Committee is raising other points in a request addressed directly to the Government.