Demande directe (CEACR) - adoptée 2021, publiée 110ème session CIT (2022)

Convention (n° 111) concernant la discrimination (emploi et profession), 1958 - Thaïlande (Ratification: 2017)

Autre commentaire sur C111

Demande directe

2021
2020

Afficher en : Francais - EspagnolTout voir

Article 1 of the Convention. Prohibition of discrimination and scope of application. Legislation. In its previous comments, the Committee noted that the non-exhaustive list of the prohibited grounds of discrimination contained in article 27 of the Constitution may cover all the grounds spelt out in Article 1(1)(a) of the Convention, although the ground of colour is not explicitly referred to. At the same time, the Committee noted that the Labour Protection Act (LPA) (B.E. 2541 (1998) and subsequent amendments) does not contain a general prohibition of discrimination in employment and occupation. Moreover, in the national legislation there is no definition of discrimination, with the exception of the provision of the Gender Equality Act (B.E. 2558 (2015)), section 3. In the light of the above, the Committee requested the Government to: (1) provide information on how article 27 of the Constitution as well as the relevant provisions of the LPA, and the Gender Equality Act are applied in practice to ensure that the principles of the Convention extend to all aspects of employment and occupation covered by Article 1(3) of the Convention and all grounds of discrimination prohibited under Article 1(1)(a) of the Convention, in particular how the Courts have been interpreting the expression “any other grounds”; (2) indicate how it is ensured that the same protection is applied to all workers – including the categories of workers excluded from the scope of application of the LPA and subsequent amendments under section 22; (3) indicate how non-discrimination and equality of opportunity and treatment are ensured and promoted in respect of the workers in provinces where emergency laws are applied; and (4) provide information on the application of the Convention to workers in the public sector with respect to all aspects of employment and occupation covered in Article 1(3) of the Convention and in respect of all the grounds of discrimination prohibited under Article 1(1)(a).

The Committee notes that in its report the Government states that, although the ground of “colour” is not expressly referred to in article 27 of the Constitution, the reference to “other grounds” gives the judiciary room to address cases of discrimination based on colour. Nevertheless, no judgment has so far been handed down concerning article 27 of the Constitution. Concerning the application of section 15 of the LPA, which prohibits discrimination between men and women, the Committee notes the Government’s reference to Supreme Court's decision No. 6011 - 6017/2545 concerning a case of discrimination in the determination of the retirement age of women and men employees. The Government further indicates that the Committee on the Determination of Unfair Gender Discrimination, which has been established under the Gender Equality Act to examine complaints concerning cases of discrimination, has received 60 petitions from 2015 to 2021, 12 of which concerned discrimination in employment, including alleged discriminatory rejections of job applications and discriminatory dismissals on the ground of gender and gender identity and sexual orientation. As regards the application of the protections of the Convention to the categories of workers excluded from the scope of application of the LPA, the Committee notes the Government’s statement that these workers benefit from the protections afforded by the Constitution and the Gender Equality Act, in addition to the ministerial regulations issued under section 22 of the LPA, such as the Ministerial Regulation on Labour Protection in Agriculture or the Ministerial Regulation on the Protection of Workers in Fisheries (B.E. 2557 (2014)), which make reference to the non-discrimination provisions included in the LPA. Concerning the workers in provinces where emergency laws are applied, the Government indicates that the application of emergency laws may nullify the provisions on discrimination under the Constitution and the Gender Equality Act. The Governments also states that it has been persistently trying to promote equality of opportunity for workers in these areas through the Labour Service Program in the Southern Border Provinces, the programme on Economic Development and Empowerment in Southern Border Provinces, and the Royal Vocational Training Center, among others. Finally, as far as workers in the public sector are concerned, the Committee notes the Government’s reference to a set of recommendations issued by the sub-Committee on Gender Equality Promotion to tackle gender discrimination and promote equality, which include, for example, the recommendation to have gender neutral job descriptions and requirements, to encourage women’s representation in decision-making positions and to raise awareness about sexual harassment and the means to prevent and address it. The Committee asks the Government to continue to provide information on the practical application of: (i) article 27 of the Constitution; (ii) the relevant provisions of the Labour Protection Act (LPA); and (iii) the Ministerial Regulations issued under section 22 of the LPA and the Gender Equality Act (BE 2558 (2015)), including relevant judicial decisions, cases dealt with by the Committee on the Determination of Unfair Gender Discrimination and any infraction detected by the labour inspectors, where applicable, as well as examples of application of the principles of the Convention to workers in the public sector. Please also indicate what mechanisms are available to workers in the provinces where emergency laws are in force allowing them to lodge complaints and obtain reparation in case of discrimination in employment and occupation based on at least the grounds listed in Article 1(1)(a) of the Convention.

Article 1(1)(a). Discrimination based on sex. Sexual harassment. In its previous comments, the Committee requested the Government to provide information on the following: (1) whether the prohibition of sexual harassment under section 16 of the LPA covers both quid pro quo harassment (any physical, verbal or non-verbal conduct of a sexual nature and other conduct based on sex affecting the dignity of women and men which is unwelcome, unreasonable and offensive to the recipient; and a person’s rejection of, or submission to, such conduct is used explicitly or implicitly as a basis for a decision which affects that person’s job) and hostile work environment (conduct that creates an intimidating, hostile or humiliating working environment for the recipient); (2) examples of application of this provision in practice; (3) how protection from sexual harassment is ensured in law and practice in respect of harassment practised by co-workers and clients or other persons met in connection with performance of work duties; (4) how protection from sexual harassment is ensured in law and practice in respect of vocational training, access to employment, and performing work in an occupation; and (5) examples of application of section 10(2) of the Gender Equality Act, which envisages the adoption of special measures to eliminate gender-based violence, with regard to employment and occupation.

The Committee notes the Government’s statement that “any act which is intrusive, threatening, or annoying committed by those in superior positions against subordinates, either in the form of quid pro quo or hostile environment, shall be considered an offence under section 16” of the LPA. Concerning the practical application of this provision, the Government states that labour inspectors are charged with monitoring the application of section 16 of the LPA and receiving complaints from employees. However, no information is provided on violations detected or complaints received in this respect. The Government refers to two judgments of the Supreme Court related to section 16 of the LPA, namely: decision No. 1372/2545, concerning a case of sexual harassment by a worker in charge of assessing the probation period of a women worker; and decision No. 8379/2550, concerning a case of exaction of sexual favours by an employer from his employee. As regards the prohibition of sexual harassment by co-workers, the Committee notes that the Government states that the Criminal Code covers sexual offences as well as acts of bullying, maltreating, menacing, or causing to suffer humiliation or annoyance (section 397) that are committed by colleagues, customers or any other person met in relation to the performance of work duties. Section 397 of the Criminal Code also covers cases of sexual harassment in respect of vocational training, access to employment, and performing work in an occupation. In addition, the Government refers to the Rules on Acts Which Are Sexual Assault or Harassment (B.E. 2553 (2010)), issued under section 8(5) and section 83 of the Civil Service Act (B.E. 2551 (2008)), which provide for disciplinary actions in case of sexual harassment, ranging from warning and wage reduction to dismissal. The Government furthermore indicates that on 16 March 2021, Cabinet approved a Resolution on Administrative Measures for Effective Disciplinary and Ethical Procedures that provides for the application of maximum disciplinary and ethical measures to civil servants who are found to be guilty of sexual harassment, such as suspension or temporary dismissal. Concerning the application of section 10(2) of the Gender Equality Act with regard to employment and occupation, the Committee notes the Government’s indication that special measures to eliminate gender-based violence under section 10(2) of the Act are yet to be adopted. However, in 2020, the Gender Equality Promotion Committee elaborated a set of draft Measures to Prevent and Address Sexual Abuse or Harassment in the Workplace, including the establishment of internal complaint mechanisms and standard procedures to address cases of sexual harassment. The Committee recalls that addressing sexual harassment only through criminal proceedings is normally not sufficient, due to the sensitivity of the issue, the higher standard of proof and the fact that criminal law generally does not cover the full range of behaviour that constitutes sexual harassment in employment and occupation (see 2012 General Survey on the fundamental Conventions, paragraph 792). The Committee asks the Government to continue to provide examples of the application in practice of section 16 of the LPA, including cases of quid pro quo and hostile environment sexual harassment, and encourages the Government to consider amending section 16 so as to also cover cases of sexual harassment committed by co-workers and clients or other persons met in connection with the performance of work duties. Please also supply information on: (i) the application of section 397 of the Criminal Code to cases of sexual harassment in employment and occupation; (ii) any developments concerning the adoption and implementation of the draft Measures to Prevent and Address Sexual Abuse or Harassment in the Workplace; and (iii) any other measure adopted under section 10(2) of the Gender Equality Act to prevent and address sexual harassment in employment and occupation.

Article 1(2). Inherent requirements of the job. In its previous comments, the Committee requested the Government to provide information on the application in practice of article 27 of the Constitution – which provides that, in the case of members of the armed forces, the police force, government officials, other officials of the State, and officers or employees of State organizations, the enjoyment of equal rights may be restricted by law “in relation to politics, capacities, disciplines or ethics” – and section 17(2) of the Gender Equality Act – which allows for exceptions to the prohibition of gender discrimination “for the compliance with religious principles” – , and to indicate how it is ensured that the restrictions provided for in those provisions comply with the Convention. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that to date there have been no judicial decisions related to the application of article 27 of the Constitution or section 17(2) of the Gender Equality Act. The Government also states that concerns have been raised about section 17(2) of the Gender Equality Act and the Department of Women’s Affairs and Family Development is consequently conducting public hearings with a view to evaluating the impact of this provision. The evaluation should be completed in November 2021. The Committee asks the Government to continue to collect and provide information on the application in practice of article 27 of the Constitution and section 17(2) of the Gender Equality Act so as to assess the compliance of these provisions with the Convention. Please also provide information on the results of the evaluation exercise conducted by the Department of Women’s Affairs and Family Development concerning the application of section 17(2) of the Gender Equality Act as regards in particular exceptions to the prohibition of gender discrimination “for the compliance with religious principles” and any action taken as a follow-up to the evaluation.

Article 2. National Equality Policy. In its previous comments, the Committee asked the Government to provide information on the specific measures adopted under the 20-Year National Strategy (B.E. 2018 – 2037) and the 12th National Economic and Social Development Plan (2017 – 2021) to eliminate discrimination based on, at least, all the grounds prohibited under Article 1(1)(a) of the Convention and promote equality of opportunity and treatment in employment and occupation, and on their results. The Committee notes the information provided by the Government on the projects implemented under the 20-Year National Strategy to promote equality and support employment and career development of the elderly and persons with disabilities as well as to improve the quality of life of target populations, such as hill tribes. The Committee also notes the Occupational Development Program for Women, aimed at fostering skills development, which benefited 16,630 women in 2020. Concerning the implementation of the 12th National Economic and Social Development Plan, the Government refers to a number of measures directed at providing women with vocational training, personal career counselling and skills development, as well as measures aimed at improving access to education for persons with disabilities, including through financial support. The Committee asks the Government to continue to supply information on the measures adopted to eliminate discrimination based on, at least, all the grounds prohibited under Article 1(1)(a) the Convention and promote equality of opportunity and treatment in employment and occupation, and to monitor and report on their results, in cooperation with the social partners and other interested groups.

Articles 2 and 3. Equality of opportunity and treatment between men and women. In its previous comments, the Committee asked the Government to: (1) continue to provide information on the results of the various initiatives undertaken to promote equality of opportunity and treatment between men and women; (2) provide statistical data on the evolution of the distribution of men and women in the various economic sectors and occupations; and (3) provide information on any specific measure, policy or plan adopted by the Gender Equality Promotion Committee with a view to promoting and applying the principles of the Convention in the private and public sectors, including the promotion of workplace measures which favour shared family responsibility between men and women and address gender stereotypes affecting women’s access to and advancement in employment and occupation. The Committee notes the information provided by the Government concerning the Women in STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) project, which aims to reduce the skills gap between men and women and enhance women’s opportunities to career advancement. The project provided for the training of 986 women in Nakhon Ratchasima province in 2019, and 656 women in Chonburi and Samut Prakan in 2020. In 2021, training is targeted at the provinces of Patumthani, Nontaburi, and Prachinburi. The Government also states that women are for the largest part unpaid family workers and are otherwise concentrated in clerical occupations (women represent 70.3 per cent of all clerical workers). Regarding the measures adopted to promote shared family responsibilities between men and women, the Committee notes the Government’s reference to the establishment of childcare centres in workplaces and in communities, and the promotion of breastfeeding areas in business enterprises. The Committee asks the Government to provide information on the impact of the Women in STEM project on increasing the number of women employed in a wider range of occupations, particularly those in which they are underrepresented. The Committee also asks the Government to: (i) continue to provide information on the measures adopted to promote equality of opportunity and treatment between men and women and their impact, including information on the initiatives undertaken by the Gender Equality Promotion Committee; (ii) provide statistical data on the evolution of the distribution of men and women in the various economic sectors and occupations; and (iii) continue to supply information on the measures adopted to promote shared family responsibilities between men and women and the results achieved in terms of women’s access to and advancement in employment and occupation.

Equality of opportunity and treatment irrespective of race, colour and national extraction. Highland peoples and other ethnic groups. In its previous comments, the Committee asked the Government to continue to provide information on the measures adopted to promote equality of opportunity and treatment in employment and occupation for Highland peoples and other ethnic groups, including information on the measures taken to ensure that they can engage without discrimination in their traditional occupations and livelihoods and on any measures adopted in this regard as a follow-up to the recommendations issued by the National Human Rights Commission (Recommendation No. 3/2561of 2018). The Committee notes the Government’s reference to the Highland Occupational Security and Community Income Promotion Program, which was created in 2020 and benefited 3,255 persons. The Government also provides information on the implementation of Royal Projects aimed at promoting careers in both agricultural and non-agricultural sectors which involved 4,822 participants. Concerning the follow-up to the recommendations issued by the National Human Rights Commission, the Government states that a number of measures have been adopted in favour of the Karen people, including compensations, support for traditional occupations and a survey on land entitlements of the Karen people in national parks and reserved forest areas. The Committee further notes the Government’s indication that the Ministries of Culture and Education are working towards a ‘local curriculum management’ with a view to involving communities in the definition of educational curricula and complementing main learning courses in line with communities’ lifestyles and culture. The Committee also notes from the report of the UN Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises that: (1) ethnic minorities are disproportionately affected by large-scale development projects, with a significant negative impact on their livelihoods; (2) members of ethnic minorities who had toiled on the land for generations, through rotational farming, are being regarded as trespassers and are being criminalized, harassed and intimidated; and (3) a serious concern expressed by ethnic minorities relates to the lack of meaningful consultation before development projects are approved and/or special economic zones created (see A/HRC/41/43/Add.1, 21 Mai 2019, paragraph 72). In this regard, the Committee notes that the First National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights (2019–2022), available from the website of UNDP, provides for the conduct of consultations with ethnic groups “in order to get involved in the decision-making process in terms of strategy, policies and projects, especially in the formulation of land management and forest conservation policies as well as the development of large projects in accordance with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples” and also envisages the adoption of measures to ensure the livelihoods of highland peoples and other ethnic groups (p. 70). The Committee asks the Government to continue to provide information on the measures adopted to promote equality of opportunity and treatment in employment and occupation for Highland peoples and other ethnic groups, including information on the following: (i) the results of the survey on land entitlements of the Karen people in national parks and reserved forest areas and any follow-up action taken to ensure that the Karen people have access to the material goods, including secure access to land and resources required to carry out their traditional occupations, without discrimination; (ii) any measures adopted to prevent and address discriminatory criminalization, harassment and intimidation of workers belonging to Highland peoples and other ethnic groups that stem out of biased approaches towards their traditional occupations, which are often perceived as outdated, unproductive or environmentally harmful, adversely affecting their enjoyment of equality of opportunity and treatment in respect of occupation; and (iii) the measures adopted under the First National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights (2019–2022) to support the livelihoods of Highland peoples and other ethnic groups and involve them in the development of relevant policies, projects and strategies. Recalling the importance of access to education to achieve equality in employment and occupation, the Committee also asks the Government to continue to provide information on the implementation of the initiative directed at the ‘local curriculum management’.

General observation of 2018. In its previous comments, the Committee drew the Government’s attention to its general observation of 2018 and asked the Government to provide information in response to the questions raised in that observation. The Committee notes the information provided by the Government concerning various measures adopted in favour of stateless people in order to allow these people to live and work in Thailand.

Equality of opportunity and treatment irrespective of disabilities. Previously, the Committee asked the Government to continue to provide information on the measures taken to promote equality of opportunity and treatment in employment and occupation for persons with disabilities, including information on the following: (1) any action taken by the National Commission on Promotion and Development of Life Quality of Disabled Persons and any relevant services provided by the Service Centres for Persons with Disabilities, and their results; (2) any petitions concerning discrimination in employment and occupation dealt with by the National Commission and their outcomes; (3) statistical data on the situation of persons with disabilities in the labour market, disaggregated by sex; and (4) information on the application of the quotas established under the Ministerial Regulations B.E. 2554 (2011) and subsequent amendments. The Committee notes the Government’s reference to the 2020 Report of the Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities, according to which a proposal developed by the Disability Network Assembly has been approved and includes measures to: promote access to work and self-employment of persons with disabilities; enhance the role of provincial and general disability service centres; and address negative stereotypes in society affecting disabled persons. In addition, the Government provides information on the efforts made to combat corruption in the recruitment of persons with disabilities, promoting their career and supporting entrepreneurs and employees with disabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic, including through incentives, such as tax reductions for employers who hire persons with disabilities during the pandemic in addition to the minimum number required by the quota system. Moreover, the Fund for Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities, which has been established under the Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities Act (B.E. 2550(2007)), funds capacity-building for persons with disabilities and supports their organizations. As regards the petitions concerning discrimination in employment and occupation dealt with by the National Commission, the Government states that one complaint was received in 2020 about a case of alleged discrimination in recruitment by a public education institute. The Committee notes that the Commission found that no discrimination occurred in that specific case but recommended that the province where the petitioner lived should assist him in finding suitable employment. The Committee also notes the Government’s indication that available data indicate that the number of persons with disabilities employed in the private sector is increasing, including through the implementation of the quota system under the Ministerial Regulations B.E. 2554 (2011). Nevertheless, a number of challenges remain in meeting the employment quota of persons with disabilities, notably the shortage of people having the required qualifications, restrictions on workplace facilities and the distance between the workplace and the accommodation of the people concerned. In this regard, the Committee notes from the report of the UN Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises that about 1,152,254 persons with disabilities have only primary school education, and that public transport and workplaces are often inaccessible (see A/HRC/41/43/Add.1, 2019, paragraph 62). The Committee asks the Government to continue to provide information on the measures taken to promote equality of opportunity and treatment in employment and occupation for persons with disabilities, including information on the measures adopted or envisaged to tackle the barriers faced by persons with disabilities in accessing employment and occupation and those affecting the fulfilment of the quotas established under the Ministerial Regulations B.E. 2554 (2011), such as the lack of qualifications and the inaccessibility of workplaces and public transport. Please also continue to: (i) collect and provide updated statistical information on the situation of persons with disabilities in the labour market, disaggregated by sex, in order to allow for the monitoring and evaluation of the impact of the measures adopted; and (ii) supply information on the petitions concerning discrimination in employment and occupation dealt with by the National Commission and their outcomes.

Equality of opportunity and treatment irrespective of HIV status. The Committee notes the information provided by Government concerning the Notification of the Ministry of Labour on Prevention and Management of AIDS in the Workplace of 5 November 2020 and the elaboration of a Draft Bill on the Elimination of Discrimination at the initiative of the Foundation for Aids Rights (FAR) that is currently under consideration by the Government. The Committee asks the Government to provide information on the measures adopted in the framework of the Ministry of Labour’s Notification in order to promote equality of opportunity and treatment in employment and occupation for persons living with HIV. Please also provide information on any new developments concerning the Draft Bill on the Elimination of Discrimination.

Article 3(a). Cooperation with workers’ and employers’ organizations. In its previous comments, noting the establishment of various tripartite committees in charge of labour-related matters, the Committee asked the Government to provide details on any specific initiatives undertaken by these bodies with a view to promoting the principles of the Convention. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that at present 15 tripartite committees have been established. Concerning relevant initiatives taken by these committees to promote the principles of the Convention, the Committee notes the information provided by the Government concerning a number of them. In particular, the Committee notes that the Labour Welfare Committee has focused on the prevention and management of HIV/AIDS in the workplace with a view to eliminating discrimination against people living with HIV in employment through the elaboration of the ‘notification’ mentioned above and the provision of support to employers to ensure that they comply with its instructions. The Committee further notes that the Wage Committee, in its announcement ;o. 10 on the minimum wage, has stated that employers shall pay wages not inferior to the legal minimum wage regardless of the nationality, age or gender of the worker (clause 8). The Committee asks the Government to continue to provide information on the initiatives undertaken by the various tripartite committees to promote the principles of the Convention and their impact.

Article 4. Measures affecting an individual suspected of activities prejudicial to the security of the State. In its previous comments, the Committee asked the Government to provide examples of application of article 40 of the Constitution – which provides that a person’s freedom to engage in an occupation can be restricted by law for the purpose of maintaining the security of the country or for other public interests - and section 17(2) of the Gender Equality Act – which allows for exceptions to the application of the principle of non-discrimination for reasons related to the national security – in the areas of employment and occupation, and to indicate how it is ensured that the restrictions adopted comply with Article 4 of the Convention and do not constitute discrimination under its Article 1. The Committee notes the Government’s reference to an example of the application of article 40 of the Constitution, namely the National Vaccine Security Act B.E. 2561 (2018) which provides that the National Vaccine Committee shall consist of members who do not hold political positions, are not local council members, do not hold local administrative positions, are not part of the managing committee of political staff nor are consultants or staff of political parties. The Government explains that those restrictions are justified by the need to ensure that the distribution of vaccines is not affected by political factors. As regards section 17(2) of the Gender Equality Act, the Committee notes the Government’s statement that it is aware that there are suggestions that this provision should be amended. The Act is thus being reviewed by the Department of Women's Affairs and Family Development. The Committee asks the Government to provide information on the outcome of the review of section 17(2) of the Gender Equality Act undertaken by the Department of Women's Affairs and Family Development as far as the exceptions to the application of the principle of non-discrimination for reasons related to the national security are concerned and any amendments proposed. Please also continue to monitor the application of article 40 of the Constitution to ensure that the restrictions provided therein comply with Article 4 of the Convention and do not constitute discrimination under its Article 1, and continue to provide examples of its application in practice.

Article 5. Special measures. Previously, the Committee asked the Government to indicate if any special measures have been adopted by virtue of article 27 of the Constitution to promote equality of opportunity and treatment in employment and occupation for categories in need of special protection or assistance. The Committee notes the Government’s reference to the measures adopted in favour of the elderly, people with disabilities, women and highland people, which have been recalled in the paragraphs above.

Maternity protection. In its previous comments, the Committee noted that under section 15 of the LPA unequal treatment between men and women may be allowed if required by the “description or nature of work”. Section 38 of the LPA introduces restrictions to women’s access to a number of occupations, such as mining or construction work to be performed underground, underwater, in a cave, in a tunnel or mountain shaft, except where the conditions of work are not harmful to the health or body of the employee. Section 39 further provides for restrictions in the case of pregnant women, concerning the type of tasks that they are allowed to perform and their working time (i.e. night work, overtime work and work on holidays). Therefore, the Committee asked the Government to review periodically the provisions on restrictions to women’s access to certain jobs or occupations included in the LPA in the light of the above principles to ensure that any protective measures taken are limited to maternity protection, in the strict sense, or are based on occupational safety and health risk assessments and do not constitute obstacles to the employment of women, and to provide information on the results of such review. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that the nature and working conditions for women and pregnant women are determined on the basis of women’s health risks. The Government states that 30 per cent of the employees in the mining industry are women and that the measures adopted to protect their health were not an obstacle to their employment. The Government also explains that section 39 of the LPA is meant to ensure that pregnant women have working conditions suitable to their health needs and that overtime may, for example, be allowed with their consent and provided that it does not affect their health. The Committee further notes the Government’ indication that, due to the fact that some workers produce or assemble products outside the workplace, the Homeworkers Protection Act B.E. 2553 (2010) was enacted to protect them. Section 20 of the Act in particular prohibits pregnant women from performing work that could harm their health and safety, such as work that may be dangerous because of vibrations, that involves lifting or carrying more than 15 kilograms of heavy loads, or requires exposure to aerosols, vapour, gas, dust, fumes, or fibres. Furthermore, the Committee notes that the Government has provided information on its plan to conduct reviews of the LPA and the Homeworkers Protection Act, which are expected to be completed, respectively, in 2024 and 2022. Noting the information provided by the Government and recalling that provisions relating to the protection of persons working under hazardous or difficult conditions should be aimed at protecting the health and safety of both men and women at work, while taking account of gender differences with regard to specific risks to their health, the Committee asks the Government to provide information on the outcome of the reviews of the LPA and the Homeworkers Protection Act and the recommendations arising out thereof, as regards sections 15, 38 and 39 of the former and section 20 of the latter.

Enforcement. In its previous comments, the Committee asked the Government to: (1) continue to provide information on judicial decisions and cases dealt with by the National Human Rights Commission involving issues related to the application of the Convention, as well as information on any violations in this respect brought to the attention of or detected by the Labour Protection and Welfare Offices, and their outcomes; and (2) provide information on any relevant action taken by the Committee on Consideration of Unfair Gender Discrimination established under section 14 of the Gender Equality Act. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that in 2020 the National Human Rights Commission received nine complaints concerning discrimination in employment and occupation, including cases of gender-based discrimination and discrimination on the ground of HIV status. As regards the Committee on Consideration of Unfair Gender Discrimination, the Government states that a case of discrimination against a transgender woman was dealt with. The Committee also refers to the information about cases of discriminatory rejections of job applications and discriminatory dismissals on the ground of gender and gender identity and sexual orientation that have been noted in the previous paragraphs. The Committee asks the Government to continue to provide information on judicial decisions and cases dealt with by the National Human Rights Commission involving issues related to the application of the Convention as well as any relevant case addressed by the Committee on Consideration of Unfair Gender Discrimination. Please also provide information on any violations related to the principles of the Convention brought to the attention of or detected by the Labour Protection and Welfare Offices, and their outcomes as well as any measures adopted to enhance the capacity of labour inspectors to identify, prevent and address cases of discrimination.