Demande directe (CEACR) - adoptée 2021, publiée 110ème session CIT (2022)

Convention (n° 87) sur la liberté syndicale et la protection du droit syndical, 1948 - Mozambique (Ratification: 1996)

Autre commentaire sur C087

Observation

Demande directe

Afficher en : Francais - EspagnolTout voir

Act on the right to organize in the public services (Act No. 18/2014)

The Committee takes note of the Government’s indication that a revision process of the Act on the right to organize in the public services (Act No. 18/2014) is underway. The Committee hopes that this ongoing revision process, which should be conducted in full consultation with the most representative workers’ and employers’ organizations, will take into account its comments on the provisions below with a view to bringing them into full conformity with the Convention. The Committee requests the Government to keep it informed of the progress achieved and to provide a copy of the new Act after its adoption.

Article 2 of the Convention. Right of workers, without distinction whatsoever, to establish and to join organizations of their own choosing without previous authorization. The Committee had previously noted that section 4 of the Act provides that the exercise of freedom of association by 16 categories of public servants (including officers of the police, the armed forces, prison services, migration services, public relief services, magistrates and various categories of public servants exercising managerial functions or in positions of trust) will be regulated by specific legislation. It had also noted that section 57 of the Act provides that all public servants and employees may, if they so wish, establish and join trade union organizations, with the exception of the public servants referred to in subsections (d) and (e) of section 4, which relate to public servants in positions of trust, diplomatic posts and officers of paramilitary forces, including forest guards and inspectors. After recalling that the right to establish and join occupational organizations shall be guaranteed for all employees in the public service and that only the armed forces and the police may be excluded from the guarantees of the Convention, the Committee requested the Government to amend section 57 of the Act and to provide any relevant information concerning the adoption of the specific legislation referred to in section 4 of that Act. Noting the Government’s indication that these issues will be addressed in the discussions held as part of the revision process, the Committee requests the Government to keep it informed of any progress made regarding the amendment of section 57 of the Act and once again requests the Government to provide information regarding the specific legislation mentioned in section 4 of the Act.

Article 3. Election of trade union representatives in full freedom. In its previous comments, the Committee had noted that section 18(2) of the Act provides that only members who, in accordance with the law, have the status of public servants may be designated trade union representatives. The Committee had also noted that section 3 of the Act stipulates that its scope of application also includes public servants and employees who are retired. Recalling that the limitation of access to the function of trade union representation to one profession or, as in the present case, to a specific professional status, may impair the right of organizations to elect their representatives in full freedom, the Committee requested the Government to indicate whether section 18(2) allows retired public servants to be appointed as trade union representatives and, should the Act not allow retired officials to be elected, to amend this provision. The Committee notes that the Government indicates that this aspect will also be discussed during the revision process and that the information requested will be provided once the new Act is approved. While taking due note of the Government’s statement, the Committee expects that the revision process will ensure that legislation is amended so as to not preclude retired public employees from being able to be elected as union officers. The Committee requests the Government to keep it informed of any evolution in this respect.

Article 3. Right of trade union organizations to formulate their programmes in full freedom. The Committee had previously noted that section 7(3) of the Act provides that the exercise of the right to strike by public servants and employees shall be regulated by specific legislation. The Committee requested the Government to provide full information on the adoption of the legislation in question and to indicate the rules which currently govern the exercise of the right to strike by public servants and employees. Noting the Government’s indication that these matters will be addressed during the revision process, the Committee expects that they will be clarified and requests the Government to provide information on any development in this regard. The Committee also reiterates its request for the Government to specify which rules currently regulate the exercise of the right to strike by public servants and employees.

Article 4. Dissolution of trade unions by judicial authority. The Committee had previously noted that section 17(c) of the Act provides that a trade union may be dissolved by judicial decision further to an action by the Attorney General, not only when it is found that the true objectives of the organization are unlawful, but also when they are contrary to public morals or very different from the aims set out in its statutes. The Committee had considered that the last two grounds enumerated in section 17(c) were vague in nature and could give rise to decisions liable to impair the guarantees set out in the Convention. Emphasizing the importance of having the grounds justifying the judicial dissolution of trade unions set out precisely in the legislation and confined to serious violations of the legal provisions in force, the Committee noted with regret the absence of any developments and expected that all necessary measures would be taken by the Government, in full consultations with social partners, so as to amend section 17(c) of the Act. The Committee notes that the Government, in its report, states that it will be able to pronounce itself on this matter after the revision process is completed. The Committee expects that, within the framework of the revision process, the Government will take all necessary measures to ensure that section 17(c) of the Act is amended in light of the above and requests the Government to keep it informed of any progress made in this respect.

Labour Act (Act No. 23/2007)

Article 3. Right of trade unions to formulate their programmes. The Committee had previously requested the Government to take the necessary measures to amend the following provisions of the Labour Act:

– section 189, which provides for compulsory arbitration for the essential services listed in section 205, which include the postal services, the loading and unloading of animals and perishable food stuffs, fuel supply, private security services and export processing zones (section 206 and Decree No. 75/99). The Committee recalled that compulsory arbitration to end collective labour disputes or strikes is acceptable only in cases where the strike may be restricted or prohibited, namely in the case of a dispute involving public servants exercising authority in the name of the State or in essential services in the strict sense of the term (that is, services the interruption of which would endanger the life, personal safety or health of the whole or part of the population) or in situations of acute national crisis. Under these conditions, the Committee considered that disputes which may arise in services enumerated in the Labour Act should not be subject to compulsory arbitration and could be resolved within the framework of the mediation and conciliation procedures established by law;
– section 207, which provides that the strike notice shall indicate the duration of the strike. In this regard, the Committee noted the Government’s indication that this provision may be construed as allowing a strike of limited or unlimited duration, as nothing in the law imposes a time limit on strikes. The Committee considered in this regard that the wording of section 207 should be amended to provide explicitly for the right of workers and their organizations to call a strike of unlimited duration; and finally
– section 212, under which a strike may be ended by a decision of the mediation and arbitration body. In this regard, the Committee previously noted the Government’s indication that section 212(1) provides for other procedures for ending strikes, including agreement between the parties concerned or a decision by a trade union organization. The Committee recalled its view that a decision to put an end to industrial action must be taken by the workers and organizations which called the strike, and not by a mediation body.

In its last direct request, while noting the Government’s indication that it was in the process of reviewing the Labour Act and that all observations and comments made by the Committee would be taken into consideration for action, the Committee expected that the Government would take the necessary measures, in full consultation with social partners, to bring all the above-mentioned provisions into conformity with the Convention. The Committee notes that the Government, in its report, emphasizes that the amendment of sections 189, 207 and 202 is dependent on the approval of the new Labour Act and that these and other related questions may be answered after the revision is completed. The Committee trusts that the revision will be completed shortly and that the new Labour Act will ensure full conformity of all the provisions described above with the requirements under the Convention. It requests the Government to indicate all progress achieved in this respect.

The Committee reminds the Government of the possibility to avail itself of the technical assistance of the Office in relation with the revision of the Acts referred to above.